Paper · 1982

Effects of storage and seed treatments on germination of Brachiaria decumbens [grass]

P. C. Whiteman; K. Mendra

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms. Primary dormancy was variably expressed in freshly harvested seed and overcome by 'after ripening' during storage of up to three months. Long-term dormancy may be due to mechanical restriction imposed by the seed coat and to inhibition of oxygen diffusion due to the closely appressed, hard, shiny palea and lemma structures enclosing the caryopsis. Removal of these structures by hand allowed germination percentages up to 100 in naked caryopses. Impermeability of the seed coat declined with time in storage up to one year. Germination of intact stored seed reached 40% to 55%. Further storage at 10 deg C and 29% RH up to 4 years 6 months did not result in increased germination in intact caryopses, although viability was maintained at 80% to 90%. Scarification in concentrated H(,2)SO(,4) for 20 minutes increased germination of stored seed to 72%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary dormancy in Brachiaria decumbens seed was overcome by after-ripening during storage of up to three months, compared with freshly harvested seed.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Treatment
storage of up to three monthse1
Outcome
Primary dormancye1
Direction
overcomee1
Comparator
freshly harvested seede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Primary dormancy was variably expressed in freshly harvested seed and overcome by 'after ripening' during storage of up to three months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–226 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term dormancy may be due to mechanical restriction imposed by the seed coat.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Outcome
Long-term dormancye2
Qualifier
mechanical restriction imposed by the seed coate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“Long-term dormancy may be due to mechanical restriction imposed by the seed coat and to inhibition of oxygen diffusion due to the closely appressed, hard, shiny palea and lemma structures enclosing the caryopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–439 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term dormancy may be due to inhibition of oxygen diffusion by the closely appressed palea and lemma.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Outcome
Long-term dormancye2
Qualifier
inhibition of oxygen diffusione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“Long-term dormancy may be due to mechanical restriction imposed by the seed coat and to inhibition of oxygen diffusion due to the closely appressed, hard, shiny palea and lemma structures enclosing the caryopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing the palea and lemma by hand allowed germination percentages up to 100 in naked caryopses.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Organ / stage
naked caryopsese3
Treatment
Removal of these structures by hande3
Outcome
germination percentagese3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
up to 100e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“Removal of these structures by hand allowed germination percentages up to 100 in naked caryopses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–537 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Impermeability of the seed coat declined with time in storage up to one year.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Organ / stage
seed coate4
Treatment
storage up to one yeare4
Outcome
Impermeability of the seed coate4
Direction
declinede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“Impermeability of the seed coat declined with time in storage up to one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of intact stored seed reached 40% to 55%.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Outcome
Germination of intact stored seede5
Value
40% to 55%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“Germination of intact stored seed reached 40% to 55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further storage at 10 deg C and 29% RH up to 4 years 6 months did not increase germination in intact caryopses.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Treatment
Further storage at 10 deg C and 29% RH up to 4 years 6 monthse6
Outcome
germination in intact caryopsese6
Direction
did not result in increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“Further storage at 10 deg C and 29% RH up to 4 years 6 months did not result in increased germination in intact caryopses, although viability was maintained at 80% to 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–841 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Viability of stored Brachiaria decumbens seed was maintained at 80% to 90%.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Outcome
viabilitye6
Value
80% to 90%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“Further storage at 10 deg C and 29% RH up to 4 years 6 months did not result in increased germination in intact caryopses, although viability was maintained at 80% to 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scarification in concentrated sulfuric acid for 20 minutes increased germination of stored seed to 72%.

Taxon
Brachiaria decumbensUrochloa decumbense0
Treatment
Scarification in concentrated H(,2)SO(,4) for 20 minutese7
Outcome
germination of stored seede7
Direction
increasede7
Value
72%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa decumbens
Urochloa decumbens · TaxonHarry Rose from South West Rocks, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of Brachiaria decumbens was shown to be controlled by two dormancy mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Scarification in concentrated H(,2)SO(,4) for 20 minutes increased germination of stored seed to 72%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–943 · show in text ↑

sulfuric acid · growth · Urochloa decumbensPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.