Paper · 1992 · Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Science

The Effect of Nickel on Plants III The Effect of Foliar Nickel on Yield and Elemental Content of Some Crops

M. RABIE; E. ABDULLATIF; K. ASY; et al.

13
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a greenhouse, wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants and to a slight in<;reasein the dry matter production. With regard to the heavy metals absorption in plants, the cations were accumulated in the order Fe > Mn > Zn > Ni. But faba beans (Giza 2), absorbed higher amounts of those el~ments than wheat (Sakha 69) and sorghum (Giza 15). Significant amounts of nickel were found in wheat grains, by increasing its concentration in shoots for Fe andZn the opposite was true, while in Mn it was not true.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel caused nickel accumulation in wheat.

Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
accumulation of nickel in plantse0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel caused nickel accumulation in faba beans.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
accumulation of nickel in plantse0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel caused nickel accumulation in sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
accumulation of nickel in plantse0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel slightly increased dry matter production in wheat.

Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
in<;reaseine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants and to a slight in<;reasein the dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel slightly increased dry matter production in faba beans.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
in<;reaseine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants and to a slight in<;reasein the dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nickel slightly increased dry matter production in sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
foliar nickel sulphatee0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
in<;reaseine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil treated with different amounts of foliar nickel sulphate. Nickellevelsof 15,30,45, and 60 ppm led to an obvious accumulation of nickel in plants and to a slight in<;reasein the dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Element accumulation in the crops ranked Fe above Mn above Zn above Ni.

Outcome
cations were accumulated in the order Fe > Mn > Zn > Nie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cations were accumulated in the order Fe > Mn > Zn > Ni.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–386 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat, faba beans and sorghum were grown on loamy soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba beans accumulated more of the listed elements than wheat.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Material
Giza 2e0
Outcome
amounts of those el~mentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba beans (Giza 2), absorbed higher amounts of those el~ments than wheat (Sakha 69) and sorghum (Giza 15).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba beans accumulated more of the listed elements than sorghum.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Material
Giza 2e0
Outcome
amounts of those el~mentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sorghume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faba beans (Giza 2), absorbed higher amounts of those el~ments than wheat (Sakha 69) and sorghum (Giza 15).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant nickel amounts were found in wheat grain.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
amounts of nickele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant amounts of nickel were found in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nickel concentration increased in wheat.

Outcome
its concentration in shootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing its concentration in shoots for Fe andZn the opposite was true, while in Mn it was not true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“nickel were found in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported shoot concentration trend for Fe and Zn was opposite to nickel in wheat.

Outcome
Fe andZne0
Direction
oppositee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing its concentration in shoots for Fe andZn the opposite was true, while in Mn it was not true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“nickel were found in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported shoot concentration trend for Mn did not follow the opposite trend in wheat.

Outcome
Mne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing its concentration in shoots for Fe andZn the opposite was true, while in Mn it was not true.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–663 · show in text ↑
e1

“nickel were found in wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–555 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 97 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.