Abstract
A study was carried out in calcareous soil (low in ABDTPA extractable phosphorus and zinc) to evaluate the effect of zinc fortified locally developed single super phosphate fertilizers on maize grown in summer 2016. Zinc fortified fertilizers were prepared in laboratory of soil science department, University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan. Treatments consisted of mixing two levels of zinc 5 and 10 kg ha-1 with SSP during its formulation by three methods of fortification coating, blending and reaction along with separate application and no application of zinc or a control treatment. Results showed the two levels of zinc mixed by different methods with SSP significantly influenced various appraised parameters of maize crop variety. With varying zinc level and fortification methods thousand grain weights, biomass yield and zinc concentration in leaves and grain were influenced significantly. Zinc at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 fortified with SSP through coating method produced maximum yield and yield components. Zn concentrations were higher in grains than leaves. It was concluded form the study that zinc (at the rate of 10 kg ha-1) mixed with phosphate fertilizer by coating produced highest maize grain yield and this method can be recommended for calcareous soil conditions of Peshawar.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc level and fortification method significantly influenced thousand grain weight and biomass yield.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“With varying zinc level and fortification methods thousand grain weights, biomass yield and zinc concentration in leaves and grain were influenced significantly.”
t0“Maize Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc level and fortification method significantly influenced zinc concentration in leaves and grain.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“With varying zinc level and fortification methods thousand grain weights, biomass yield and zinc concentration in leaves and grain were influenced significantly.”
t0“Maize Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Coating SSP with zinc at 10 kg ha-1 produced maximum yield and yield components.
- Treatment
- Zinc at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 fortified with SSP through coating methode0
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zinc at the rate of 10 kg ha-1 fortified with SSP through coating method produced maximum yield and yield components.”
t0“Maize Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc concentrations were higher in grain than leaves.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zn concentrations were higher in grains than leaves.”
t0“Maize Crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend coating phosphate fertilizer with zinc at 10 kg ha-1 under calcareous soil conditions of Peshawar.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“this method can be recommended for calcareous soil conditions of Peshawar.”
t0“Maize Crop”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →storage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.