Paper · 1986 · Journal of American Pomological Society

In VitroPropagation of Peach: I. Propagation of‘Lovell’ and ‘Nemaguard’ Peach Rootstocks

Ali A. Almehdi; Dan E. Parfitt

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
23
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An improved tissue culture propagation medium was developed for in vitro multiplication of peach ( Prunus persicaL.) rootstocks ‘Lovell’ and ‘Nemaguard’. A 144-fold increase in number of shoots was achieved after 10 weeks with 26.7 μM (6.0 mg 1 -1) BA and 0.04 μM (0.01 mg 1 -l) IBA. Shoots continued to regenerate with subsequent subcultures. 20% of the shots rooted in the new medium without growth regulators at one half the recommended concentrations of KNO 3and (NH 4) 2SO 4plus 44.3 μM (9 mg 1 -1) IBA. Complete plants were transferred to soil, and grown with 100% survival. Explants taken from juvenile and mature plants did not differ significantly in their growth in the new medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BA and IBA medium produced a 144-fold increase in shoots after 10 weeks.

Treatment
26.7 μM (6.0 mg 1 -1) BA and 0.04 μM (0.01 mg 1 -l) IBAe0
Outcome
number of shootse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
144-folde0
Qualifier
after 10 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 144-fold increase in number of shoots was achieved after 10 weeks with 26.7 μM (6.0 mg 1 -1) BA and 0.04 μM (0.01 mg 1 -l) IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Propagation of Peach:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots continued regenerating during subsequent subcultures.

Outcome
Shoots continued to regeneratee0
Qualifier
subsequent subculturese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoots continued to regenerate with subsequent subcultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Propagation of Peach:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty percent of shoots rooted in the new medium.

Treatment
new medium without growth regulators at one half the recommended concentrations of KNO 3and (NH 4) 2SO 4plus 44.3 μM (9 mg 1 -1) IBAe0
Outcome
shots rootede0
Value
20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20% of the shots rooted in the new medium without growth regulators at one half the recommended concentrations of KNO 3and (NH 4) 2SO 4plus 44.3 μM (9 mg 1 -1) IBA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Propagation of Peach:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complete plants transferred to soil survived at 100%.

Outcome
survivale0
Value
100%e0
Setting
soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Complete plants were transferred to soil, and grown with 100% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Propagation of Peach:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth did not differ significantly between explants from juvenile and mature plants.

Material
juvenile and mature plantse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
mature plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Explants taken from juvenile and mature plants did not differ significantly in their growth in the new medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Propagation of Peach:”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

34 papers: 34 positive, 0 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.