Paper · 2018 · Field Crops Research

Impact of high temperature on heterosis and general combining ability in spring canola (Brassica napus L.)

C.B. Koscielny; S.W. Gardner; R.W. Duncan

11
claims
27
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Canola is an extremely important commodity to the western Canadian economy. Annual or geographic fluctuations in yield due to heat stress can have a significant influence on total production. To increase the stability of canola yield, breeders need to select for increased heat tolerance in a reliable, repeatable, cost effective manner that represents commercial production conditions. Field experiments with 10 (5 maintainer and 5 restorer) inbreds and the 25 corresponding hybrids were conducted across 2 years with 2 locations per year. Each experiment had two planting dates (normal planting date and a late planting date). The experiments were designed to determine if: 1) planting date can be used as a proxy for heat stress; 2) heterosis can minimize the impact of heat stress; and 3) direct selection within a heat-stress environment improves genetic gain for heat-stress tolerance. Principal component analysis of the Tmax, Tmin, Tmean, soil moisture, daily light integral and yield were conducted. The resulting biplot analyses demonstrate that the temperature variables had a greater impact on yield than soil moisture or daily light integral and therefore planting date was identified as a successful proxy for heat stress. The heat-stress treatment caused a 23% mean reduction in seed yield (20% reduction within the hybrids and 25% reduction within the inbreds) indicating that heterosis can reduce the impact of higher temperatures on canola yield. The mean heat susceptibility index was 0.94 and 1.20 for the hybrids and inbreds respectively; further demonstrating that the hybrids were more heat tolerant than the inbreds. Analyses of the GCA for the inbreds shows 4 cross-over interactions between the two temperature treatments indicating that direct selection for heat tolerance will be necessary to increase the response to selection for this trait. Overall canola breeders interested in increasing heat tolerance need to consider utilizing planting date as a high-temperature treatment and cannot rely on indirect selection from experiments under optimal conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat-stress treatment reduced mean seed yield of canola by 23% relative to normal planting.

Treatment
heat-stress treatmente1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
23%e1
Comparator
normal planting datee2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments with 10 (5 maintainer and 5 restorer) inbreds and the 25 corresponding hybrids were conducted across 2 years with 2 locations per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The heat-stress treatment caused a 23% mean reduction in seed yield (20% reduction within the hybrids and 25% reduction within the inbreds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1376 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each experiment had two planting dates (normal planting date and a late planting date)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In hybrids, the heat-stress treatment reduced seed yield by 20% relative to normal planting.

Material
hybridse1
Treatment
heat-stress treatmente1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
20%e1
Comparator
normal planting datee2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments with 10 (5 maintainer and 5 restorer) inbreds and the 25 corresponding hybrids were conducted across 2 years with 2 locations per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The heat-stress treatment caused a 23% mean reduction in seed yield (20% reduction within the hybrids and 25% reduction within the inbreds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1376 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each experiment had two planting dates (normal planting date and a late planting date)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In inbreds, the heat-stress treatment reduced seed yield by 25% relative to normal planting.

Material
inbredse1
Treatment
heat-stress treatmente1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
normal planting datee2
Setting
Field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiments with 10 (5 maintainer and 5 restorer) inbreds and the 25 corresponding hybrids were conducted across 2 years with 2 locations per year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The heat-stress treatment caused a 23% mean reduction in seed yield (20% reduction within the hybrids and 25% reduction within the inbreds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1376 · show in text ↑
e2

“Each experiment had two planting dates (normal planting date and a late planting date)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean heat susceptibility index of hybrids was 0.94.

Material
hybridse3
Outcome
mean heat susceptibility indexe3
Value
0.94e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean heat susceptibility index was 0.94 and 1.20 for the hybrids and inbreds respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1558 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean heat susceptibility index of inbreds was 1.20.

Material
inbredse3
Outcome
mean heat susceptibility indexe3
Value
1.20e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“The mean heat susceptibility index was 0.94 and 1.20 for the hybrids and inbreds respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1558 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrids were more heat tolerant than inbreds.

Material
hybridse4
Outcome
heat tolerante4
Direction
more heat tolerante4
Comparator
inbredse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“the hybrids were more heat tolerant than the inbreds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GCA analysis of inbreds showed 4 cross-over interactions between the two temperature treatments.

Material
inbredse5
Treatment
two temperature treatmentse5
Outcome
cross-over interactionse5
Value
4e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“Analyses of the GCA for the inbreds shows 4 cross-over interactions between the two temperature treatments indicating that direct selection for heat tolerance will be necessary to increase the response to selection for this trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1870 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that direct selection for heat tolerance will be necessary to increase the response to selection.

Outcome
direct selection for heat tolerance will be necessarye5
Qualifier
to increase the response to selection for this traite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“Analyses of the GCA for the inbreds shows 4 cross-over interactions between the two temperature treatments indicating that direct selection for heat tolerance will be necessary to increase the response to selection for this trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1870 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that canola breeders use planting date as a high-temperature treatment and not rely on indirect selection under optimal conditions.

Outcome
utilizing planting date as a high-temperature treatmente7
Qualifier
cannot rely on indirect selection from experiments under optimal conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“canola breeders interested in increasing heat tolerance need to consider utilizing planting date as a high-temperature treatment and cannot rely on indirect selection from experiments under optimal conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date was identified as a successful proxy for heat stress in canola.

Treatment
planting datee6
Outcome
successful proxy for heat stresse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“the temperature variables had a greater impact on yield than soil moisture or daily light integral and therefore planting date was identified as a successful proxy for heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1235 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature variables had a greater impact on canola yield than soil moisture or daily light integral.

Treatment
temperature variablese6
Outcome
impact on yielde6
Direction
greater impacte6
Comparator
soil moisture or daily light integrale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“spring canola (Brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“the temperature variables had a greater impact on yield than soil moisture or daily light integral and therefore planting date was identified as a successful proxy for heat stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1235 · show in text ↑

heat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 3 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.