Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Characterization of Salt Tolerant Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Genotypes on the Basis of Physiological Attributes

Wajid Mahboob

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits, decisive for their salt tolerance. Ten wheat genotypes along with salt tolerant check (LU-26s) were evaluated under two salinity levels (control and 120 mM NaCl). Salt stress significantly affected growth and yield attributes, as well as physiological traits of wheat genotypes. However, LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better growth in terms of plant height, productive tiller, plant biomass and grain yield per plant. These genotypes also demonstrated least degradation in chlorophyll contents with significant increase in endogenous level of proline, glycine betaine (GB), total phenols (TP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and maintained high potassium (K + ) content by restricting sodium (Na + ) uptake in response to salt stress. Genotypes NIA-AS-9 and 4 performed moderately but NIA-AS-14-8 and CT-09149 failed to adjust osmotically and resulted in poor growth and yield under saline stress. Wheat grain yield was positively correlated with K + , proline and TSS; however, it showed negative relationship with Na + contents under salinity. Based on growth and yield parameters, physiological attributes and ion accumulation, wheat genotypes CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, NIA-AS-14-2 and Tatara could be categorized as salt tolerant and may be further evaluated for mechanisms conferring salinity tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly affected growth and yield attributes and physiological traits of wheat genotypes.

Treatment
Salt stresse2
Outcome
growth and yield attributese2
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ten wheat genotypes along with salt tolerant check (LU-26s) were evaluated under two salinity levels (control and 120 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–284 · show in text ↑
e2

“Salt stress significantly affected growth and yield attributes, as well as physiological traits of wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–400 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better plant height, productive tiller and plant biomass under salinity.

Material
LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2e3
Outcome
plant height, productive tiller, plant biomasse3
Direction
bettere3
Setting
glass housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better growth in terms of plant height, productive tiller, plant biomass and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–574 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better grain yield per plant under salinity.

Material
LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2e3
Outcome
grain yield per plante3
Direction
bettere3
Setting
glass housee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better growth in terms of plant height, productive tiller, plant biomass and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–574 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 showed least degradation in chlorophyll contents under salinity.

Material
LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2e3
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse4
Direction
least degradatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, LU-26s, CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, Tatara and NIA-AS-14-2 had better growth in terms of plant height, productive tiller, plant biomass and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–574 · show in text ↑
e4

“These genotypes also demonstrated least degradation in chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased endogenous proline, glycine betaine and total phenols in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
salt stresse5
Outcome
endogenous level of proline, glycine betaine (GB), total phenols (TP)e5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ten wheat genotypes along with salt tolerant check (LU-26s) were evaluated under two salinity levels (control and 120 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–284 · show in text ↑
e5

“with significant increase in endogenous level of proline, glycine betaine (GB), total phenols (TP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and maintained high potassium (K + ) content by restricting sodium (Na + ) uptake in response to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased endogenous total soluble sugars in wheat genotypes.

Treatment
salt stresse5
Outcome
total soluble sugars (TSS)e5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ten wheat genotypes along with salt tolerant check (LU-26s) were evaluated under two salinity levels (control and 120 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–284 · show in text ↑
e5

“with significant increase in endogenous level of proline, glycine betaine (GB), total phenols (TP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and maintained high potassium (K + ) content by restricting sodium (Na + ) uptake in response to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-stressed wheat genotypes maintained high potassium content by restricting sodium uptake.

Treatment
salt stresse5
Compound
sodium (Na + )e5
Outcome
potassium (K + ) contente5
Direction
maintained highe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“with significant increase in endogenous level of proline, glycine betaine (GB), total phenols (TP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and maintained high potassium (K + ) content by restricting sodium (Na + ) uptake in response to salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes NIA-AS-9 and 4 performed moderately under salinity.

Material
NIA-AS-9 and 4e6
Outcome
performede6
Direction
moderatelye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“Genotypes NIA-AS-9 and 4 performed moderately but NIA-AS-14-8 and CT-09149 failed to adjust osmotically and resulted in poor growth and yield under saline stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1050 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes NIA-AS-14-8 and CT-09149 had poor growth and yield under saline stress.

Material
NIA-AS-14-8 and CT-09149e6
Treatment
saline stresse6
Outcome
growth and yielde6
Direction
poore6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A glass house experiment was conducted to investigate the potential of different wheat genotypes for physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“Genotypes NIA-AS-9 and 4 performed moderately but NIA-AS-14-8 and CT-09149 failed to adjust osmotically and resulted in poor growth and yield under saline stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1050 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was positively correlated with K+, proline and total soluble sugars.

Compound
K + , proline and TSSe7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
positively correlatede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Wheat grain yield was positively correlated with K + , proline and TSS; however, it showed negative relationship with Na + contents under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield showed a negative relationship with Na+ contents under salinity.

Compound
Na + contentse7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
negative relationshipe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Wheat grain yield was positively correlated with K + , proline and TSS; however, it showed negative relationship with Na + contents under salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1198 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat genotypes CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, NIA-AS-14-2 and Tatara could be categorized as salt tolerant (author conclusion).

Material
CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, NIA-AS-14-2 and Tatarae1
Outcome
salt tolerante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Based on growth and yield parameters, physiological attributes and ion accumulation, wheat genotypes CT-09117, NRL-1237, NRL-1235, NIA-AS-14-2 and Tatara could be categorized as salt tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1391 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.