Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Effects of Different Metals on Photosynthesis: Cadmium and Zinc Affect Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Durum Wheat

Momchil Paunov; Lyubka Koleva; Andon Vassilev; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
374
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

(600 µM) on photosynthetic performance of hydroponically-grown durum wheat seedlings was performed. At day 8, Cd and Zn were added to the nutrient solution. After 7-days exposure, the chosen concentrations of both metals resulted in similar relative growth rate (RGR) inhibitions of about 50% and comparable retardations of the CO₂ assimilation rates (about 30%) in the second developed leaf of wheat seedlings. Analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence indicated that both metals disturbed photosynthetic electron transport processes which led to a 4- to 5-fold suppression of the efficiency of energy transformation in Photosystem II. Non-specific toxic effects of Cd and Zn, which prevailed, were an inactivation of part of Photosystem II reaction centres and their transformation into excitation quenching forms as well as disturbed electron transport in the oxygen-evolving complex. The specificity of the Cd and Zn modes of action was mainly expressed in the intensity of the toxicity effects: despite the similar inhibitions of the CO₂ assimilation rates, the wheat photochemistry showed much more sensitivity to Cd than to Zn exposure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd inhibited wheat relative growth rate by about 50%.

Treatment
Cde1
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
inhibitionse0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chosen concentrations of both metals resulted in similar relative growth rate (RGR) inhibitions of about 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd and Zn were added to the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn inhibited wheat relative growth rate by about 50%.

Treatment
Zinct0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0
Direction
inhibitionse0
Value
about 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chosen concentrations of both metals resulted in similar relative growth rate (RGR) inhibitions of about 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cadmium and Zinc Affect Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cd retarded wheat CO₂ assimilation by about 30%.

Organ / stage
second developed leafe0
Treatment
Cde1
Outcome
CO₂ assimilation ratese0
Direction
retardationse0
Value
about 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparable retardations of the CO₂ assimilation rates (about 30%) in the second developed leaf of wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd and Zn were added to the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cadmium and Zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn retarded wheat CO₂ assimilation by about 30%.

Organ / stage
second developed leafe0
Treatment
Zne1
Outcome
CO₂ assimilation ratese0
Direction
retardationse0
Value
about 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparable retardations of the CO₂ assimilation rates (about 30%) in the second developed leaf of wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cd and Zn were added to the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cadmium and Zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both metals suppressed photosystem II energy transformation efficiency four- to five-fold.

Treatment
both metalse0
Outcome
efficiency of energy transformation in Photosystem IIe0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
4- to 5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both metals disturbed photosynthetic electron transport processes which led to a 4- to 5-fold suppression of the efficiency of energy transformation in Photosystem II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both metals inactivated some photosystem II reaction centres and disrupted electron transport in the oxygen-evolving complex.

Outcome
inactivation of part of Photosystem II reaction centres and their transformation into excitation quenching forms as well as disturbed electron transport in the oxygen-evolving complexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an inactivation of part of Photosystem II reaction centres and their transformation into excitation quenching forms as well as disturbed electron transport in the oxygen-evolving complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat photochemistry was more sensitive to Cd than Zn despite similar CO₂ assimilation inhibition.

Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
wheat photochemistrye0
Direction
much more sensitivitye0
Comparator
Zn exposuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite the similar inhibitions of the CO₂ assimilation rates, the wheat photochemistry showed much more sensitivity to Cd than to Zn exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1139 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 5 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.