Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Farm. B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand to study the “Effect of application of manures and bio-fertilizers on yield, soil fertility and economics of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under middle Gujarat conditions.” during kharif season of 2008. The soil of experimental plot was loamy sand in texture. It was low in organic carbon and available nitrogen, while high in available phosphorus and potash with pH 7.8 and EC value 0.14 dSm-1. The experiment comprising twelve-treatment combinations was laid out in factorial randomized block design with four replications. The treatment consisted of combinations of three type of manures viz., recommended dose of 12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha (M1), vermicompost @1000 kg/ha (M2) and poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha (M3) and four type of bio-fertilizers (seed inoculation) viz., no bio-fertilizers (B1), Rhizobium (B2), VAM (B3) and PSB (B4). The results of experiment revealed that the groundnut crop fertilized with manures showed marked increase in pod yield (2.6 t/ha) and haulm yield (4.7 t/ha) were obtained under application of RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha) and was significantly superior over poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha and vermicompost @1000 kg/ha. This type of manures has also recorded the maximum net realization of Rs 54542/ha with 4.16 benefit cost ratio emerged as optimum and the most economical for groundnut. The results indicated that the groundnut crop fertilized with bio-fertilizers significantly higher pod yield (2.7 t/ha) and haulm yield (5.0 t/ha) was registered under seed inoculation with Rhizobium which was statistically at par with PSB (Seed inoculation) B4. The seed inoculation with Rhizobium has also recorded the maximum net returns of Rs 56576/ha with 4.17 BCR.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer produced 2.6 t/ha groundnut pod yield, exceeding poultry manure and vermicompost.
- Taxon
- Groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)e0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 2.6 t/hae0
- Comparator
- poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha and vermicompost @1000 kg/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pod yield (2.6 t/ha) and haulm yield (4.7 t/ha) were obtained under application of RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha) and was significantly superior over poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha and vermicompost @1000 kg/ha.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer produced 4.7 t/ha haulm yield, exceeding poultry manure and vermicompost.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)e0
- Outcome
- haulm yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 4.7 t/hae0
- Comparator
- poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha and vermicompost @1000 kg/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pod yield (2.6 t/ha) and haulm yield (4.7 t/ha) were obtained under application of RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha) and was significantly superior over poultry manure @ 500 kg/ha and vermicompost @1000 kg/ha.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer gave maximum net realization of Rs 54542/ha.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)e1
- Outcome
- net realizatione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs 54542/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum net realization of Rs 54542/ha with 4.16 benefit cost ratio”
e1“application of RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended fertilizer gave a 4.16 benefit cost ratio.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)e1
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 4.16e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum net realization of Rs 54542/ha with 4.16 benefit cost ratio”
e1“application of RDF (12.5 kg N/ha + 25 kg P2O5/ha)”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium seed inoculation produced significantly higher pod yield of 2.7 t/ha, statistically at par with PSB.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.7 t/hae0
- Comparator
- PSB (Seed inoculation)e0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher pod yield (2.7 t/ha) and haulm yield (5.0 t/ha) was registered under seed inoculation with Rhizobium which was statistically at par with PSB (Seed inoculation) B4.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium seed inoculation produced significantly higher haulm yield of 5.0 t/ha, statistically at par with PSB.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- haulm yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5.0 t/hae0
- Comparator
- PSB (Seed inoculation)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher pod yield (2.7 t/ha) and haulm yield (5.0 t/ha) was registered under seed inoculation with Rhizobium which was statistically at par with PSB (Seed inoculation) B4.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium seed inoculation gave maximum net returns of Rs 56576/ha.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs 56576/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed inoculation with Rhizobium has also recorded the maximum net returns of Rs 56576/ha with 4.17 BCR.”
t0“Groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium seed inoculation gave a 4.17 BCR.
- Taxon
- GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- BCRe0
- Value
- 4.17e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed inoculation with Rhizobium has also recorded the maximum net returns of Rs 56576/ha with 4.17 BCR.”
t0“Groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
174 papers more in this group
See all 178 papers →inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
217 papers more in this group
See all 221 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.