Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of micronutrient application on quality and shelf-life of kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)

Pankaj Kumar Maurya; L.R. Yadav; Pushpam Patel; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Onion (Allium cepa L.) is one of the most important commercial vegetable crops being grown all over the country. Onion belongs to family ‘Amaryllidaceae” and Locally known as Pyaj. The experiment was carried out during Kharif season of 2016-2017 at Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi kothi farm, Dholi (Muzaffarpur), a campus of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa (Samastipur), Bihar to study the effect of micronutrient application on quality and shelf-life of kharif onion. The experiment was laid out in RBD design with ten treatments and three replications. Significant observations were recorded for maximum TSS, dry weight of leaves/plant and dry weight of bulb/plant was with treatment T3 (NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/ha). The minimum sugar contains, bulb rotting and physiological loss of weight was recorded with treatment T5 (NPKS + soil application of Borax @ 10 kg/ha).The lowest sprouting percentage was found in treatment T3 (NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 treatment T3 gave maximum TSS and dry weights of leaves and bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/hae0
Outcome
TSS, dry weight of leaves/plant and dry weight of bulb/plante0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant observations were recorded for maximum TSS, dry weight of leaves/plant and dry weight of bulb/plant was with treatment T3 (NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Borax treatment T5 gave minimum sugar content, bulb rotting and physiological weight loss.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
NPKS + soil application of Borax @ 10 kg/hae0
Outcome
sugar contains, bulb rotting and physiological loss of weighte0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum sugar contains, bulb rotting and physiological loss of weight was recorded with treatment T5 (NPKS + soil application of Borax @ 10 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 treatment T3 had the lowest sprouting percentage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/hae0
Outcome
sprouting percentagee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest sprouting percentage was found in treatment T3 (NPKS + soil application of ZnSO4 @ 50kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–94 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.