Paper · 2009 · Anhui Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.

Sun QiBao; Sun Jun; Feifei Yu; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During the development of grape fruits,the effects of fertilizing calcium on the fruit qualities and the resistance to S.ampelinum were studied.The method of application of Ca included leaves spraying,soil-fertilizing,and the colligation of leaf-spraying and soil-fertilizing.The results showed all the treatments increased more or less the content of Ca in the fruits.Of all the treatments,the spraying of 1.00%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 and 1.25%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 combined with 1.00%(W/V)CaCl2,could increase the content of Ca significantly.The content of Ca was negative correlation with the incidence of disease and the disease index in grape fruit.The N/Ca was positive correlation with the incidence of disease and the disease index in grape fruit.Ca could promote the grape fruit's resistance to S.ampulinum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All calcium treatments increased the Ca content of grape fruits.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
fertilizing calciumt0
Outcome
content of Ca in the fruitse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed all the treatments increased more or less the content of Ca in the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.00%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 and 1.25%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 combined with 1.00%(W/V)CaCl2 could increase fruit Ca content significantly.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
spraying of 1.00%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 and 1.25%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 combined with 1.00%(W/V)CaCl2e2
Outcome
content of Cae2
Direction
could increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“Of all the treatments,the spraying of 1.00%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 and 1.25%(W/V)Ca(NO3)2 combined with 1.00%(W/V)CaCl2,could increase the content of Ca significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–525 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Ca content was negatively correlated with disease incidence and disease index of grape fruit.

Taxon
grapet0
Compound
Cae3
Outcome
incidence of disease and the disease indexe3
Direction
negative correlatione3

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of Ca was negative correlation with the incidence of disease and the disease index in grape fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–635 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N/Ca ratio was positively correlated with disease incidence and disease index of grape fruit.

Taxon
grapet0
Compound
N/Cae4
Outcome
incidence of disease and the disease indexe4
Direction
positive correlatione4

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“The N/Ca was positive correlation with the incidence of disease and the disease index in grape fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca promotes grape fruit resistance to Sphaceloma ampelinum.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Cae5
Interactor
S.ampulinume5pathogen
Outcome
resistancee5
Direction
promotee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of fertilizing calcium on the resistance of grape fruits to Sphaceloma ampelinum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“Ca could promote the grape fruit's resistance to S.ampulinum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–797 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 46 positive, 5 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.