Paper · 2018 · Fruits

Postharvest treatment of mango: Potential use of essential oil with thymol to control anthracnose development

chillet@cirad.fr; M. Chillet; J. Minier; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Introduction – Anthracnose, a fungal disease caused by the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species is the main postharvest problem concerning mango (Mangifera indica) production on La Reunion Island. Traditional postharvest treatments involve chemical compounds that do not comply with the expectations of consumers or importing countries. Chemical treatments are generally used against C. gloeosporioides. Our goal was to develop alternative postharvest treatments using the fungitoxic properties of two essential oils (EO). Materials and methods – Two commercial essential oils, X2 and X5, were used at various concentrations and compared to a no-oil control. A first batch of treatments were tested in vitro for studying mycelial growth and the inhibition of conidial germination. The second experiment measured the effects of the treatments on the fruit quality of inoculated mangoes var. Tommy Atkins with a solution of C. gloeosporioides spores. Results and discussion – In vitro, X5 mainly composed of thymol was very fungitoxic against C. gloeosporioides. The concentrations of phenolic compounds and resorcinol in the fruits were increased after the X5 treatments, expressing some positive effects of essential oil treatments on fruit resistance mechanisms. The quality of treated fruits verified the requirements to meet consumers' expectations. Conclusion – Thymol-based EO exhibited a strong fungitoxic in vitro activity but it had no detectable effect when applied by volatilization on mango necrosis. Alternatives ways of treatments should be tested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro, essential oil X5, mainly composed of thymol, was very fungitoxic against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides compared with a no-oil control.

Taxon
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0
Treatment
X5 mainly composed of thymole0
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
fungitoxice0
Direction
very fungitoxice0
Comparator
no-oil controle1
Setting
In vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · TaxonRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro, X5 mainly composed of thymol was very fungitoxic against C. gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1061 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two commercial essential oils, X2 and X5, were used at various concentrations and compared to a no-oil control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Concentrations of phenolic compounds and resorcinol in mango fruits increased after X5 treatments compared with the no-oil control.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
X5 treatmentse0
Outcome
concentrations of phenolic compounds and resorcinole0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-oil controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of phenolic compounds and resorcinol in the fruits were increased after the X5 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two commercial essential oils, X2 and X5, were used at various concentrations and compared to a no-oil control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Postharvest treatment of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thymol-based essential oil applied by volatilization had no detectable effect on necrosis of inoculated mango.

Treatment
Thymol-based EOe0
Outcome
mango necrosise0
Direction
no detectable effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thymol-based EO exhibited a strong fungitoxic in vitro activity but it had no detectable effect when applied by volatilization on mango necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quality of essential-oil-treated mango fruits met the requirements for consumers' expectations.

Outcome
quality of treated fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of treated fruits verified the requirements to meet consumers' expectations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Postharvest treatment of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.