Paper · 2002 · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)

Antifungal Activity of Leaf and Stem Extracts from Various Plant Species on the Incidence of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides of Papaya and Mango Fruit After Storage

Silvia Bautista‐Baños; Laura Leticia Barrera‐Necha; Leticia Bravo-Luna

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

"Aqueous extracts of leaves and stems of Achras sapota, Annona reticulata, Bromelia hemisphaerica, Carica papaya, Citrus limon, Chrysophylum cainito, Dyospiros ebenaster, Mangifera indica, Persea americana, Pouteria sapota, Spondias purpurea, and Tamarindus indicus from the state of Morelos, Mexico were tested for their antifungal activity against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Papaya and mango fruit were dipped in extracts, inoculated with C. gloeosporioides, and stored for seven days at room temperature to evaluate percentage infection and severity, solid solubles concentration (SSC), and fruit mass loss. Differences were found between the inhibitory effects in vitro and in vivo. Leaf extracts from C. limon and P. americana totally inhibited growth of C. gloeosporioides in vitro. Leaf extracts of C. papaya completely inhibited postharvest rots of papaya, while leaf and stem extracts of D. ebenaster had an adequate fungicidal effect when applied to mango. Infection severity of papaya ranged from 0 to 50% of the fruit surface, while in mango only 25% of the surface was affected. Overall, infection severity was reduced for both papaya and mango when dipped in extracts. SSC and fruit mass loss varied among plant extracts; however, extracts did not affect fruit quality during storage. "

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extracts of C. limon totally inhibited growth of C. gloeosporioides in vitro.

Taxon
C. limonCitrus ×limone1
Treatment
Leaf extractse1
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioidese1
Direction
totally inhibitede1
Setting
in vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x limon
Citrus ×limon · TaxonElena Chochkova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Leaf extracts from C. limon and P. americana totally inhibited growth of C. gloeosporioides in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extracts of P. americana totally inhibited growth of C. gloeosporioides in vitro.

Taxon
P. americanaPersea americanae1
Treatment
Leaf extractse1
Interactor
C. gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Outcome
growth of C. gloeosporioidese1
Direction
totally inhibitede1
Setting
in vitroe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Leaf extracts from C. limon and P. americana totally inhibited growth of C. gloeosporioides in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extracts of C. papaya completely inhibited postharvest rots of papaya.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae2
Treatment
Leaf extracts of C. papayae2
Outcome
postharvest rots of papayae2
Direction
completely inhibitede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Leaf extracts of C. papaya completely inhibited postharvest rots of papaya”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem extracts of D. ebenaster had an adequate fungicidal effect on mango.

Treatment
leaf and stem extracts of D. ebenastere3
Outcome
fungicidal effecte3
Direction
adequatee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“while leaf and stem extracts of D. ebenaster had an adequate fungicidal effect when applied to mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection severity on papaya fruit ranged from 0 to 50% of the fruit surface.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae4
Outcome
Infection severitye4
Value
0 to 50%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Infection severity of papaya ranged from 0 to 50% of the fruit surface, while in mango only 25% of the surface was affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infection severity on mango fruit was only 25% of the surface.

Outcome
Infection severitye4
Value
25%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Infection severity of papaya ranged from 0 to 50% of the fruit surface, while in mango only 25% of the surface was affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping papaya fruit in extracts reduced infection severity.

Taxon
papayaCarica papayae5
Treatment
dipped in extractse5
Outcome
infection severitye5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, infection severity was reduced for both papaya and mango when dipped in extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping mango fruit in extracts reduced infection severity.

Treatment
dipped in extractse5
Outcome
infection severitye5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, infection severity was reduced for both papaya and mango when dipped in extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extracts did not affect fruit quality during storage of papaya and mango.

Taxon
papaya and mangoCarica papayaMangifera indicae5
Treatment
plant extractse6
Outcome
fruit qualitye6
Direction
did not affecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, infection severity was reduced for both papaya and mango when dipped in extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1222 · show in text ↑
e6

“SSC and fruit mass loss varied among plant extracts; however, extracts did not affect fruit quality during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSC and fruit mass loss varied among plant extracts on papaya and mango.

Taxon
papaya and mangoCarica papayaMangifera indicae5
Outcome
SSC and fruit mass losse6
Direction
variede6
Qualifier
among plant extractse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Overall, infection severity was reduced for both papaya and mango when dipped in extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1222 · show in text ↑
e6

“SSC and fruit mass loss varied among plant extracts; however, extracts did not affect fruit quality during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences were found between the inhibitory effects of extracts in vitro and in vivo on papaya and mango.

Taxon
Papaya and MangoCarica papayaMangifera indicat0
Outcome
inhibitory effects in vitro and in vivoe7
Qualifier
Differences were found betweene7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carica papaya
Carica papaya · TaxonCarlquist, Sherwin John, 1930-2021 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Colletotrichum gloeosporioides of Papaya and Mango Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“Differences were found between the inhibitory effects in vitro and in vivo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–726 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Carica papaya (papaya)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

botanical · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

botanical · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Citrus x limon (lemon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · organism · Carica papaya (papaya)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Persea americana (avocado)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.