Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during 2012 and 2013 seasons in the Experimental Farm ofAgriculture Research Station, Agric. Res. Center at Ismailia, Egypt to study the effect of four levels of phosphaticfertilizer i.e., 15.5, 23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad (faddan= 4200 m2) with and without the bio fertilizers phosphorine ormicrobein on yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv. The spread variety Gereogry surpassed significantly the erect variety Giza 6 in yield (pods, seeds andbiological yield/fad), yield components (plant height, number and dry weight of pods/plant, dry weight of seeds /plant,100- seed weight and shelling percentage) and yield quality (seed oil content% and oil and protein yield/fad. While, thetwo studied varieties did not differ significantly from each other in dry weight of straw/plant, fodder yield/fad and seedprotein content %). Increasing phosphorus levels from 0 to 31 kg P2O5/fad increased significantly the forementionedyield, yield components and yield quality; expect the non significant effect of P levels on seed protein content %. It isworthy to note that bio fertilizers phosphorine or microbein increased the efficiency of peanut plants in utilizingphosphours fertilizer, which in turn had favourable effect on peanut productivity. The increment of yield, yieldcomponent and yield quality of peanutcvs was more pronounced and its values were higher when peanut plantsfertilized with phosphorus fertilizer combined with phosphorine or microbein than fertilized with P only and the twobiofertilizers did not differ significantly in this respect. P levels up to the highest level (31 kg P2O5) with or withoutbiofertilizers increased significantly peanut yield, yield components and yield quality, except that there was nosignificant difference between to two higher levels of P (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad) in plant height, 100-seed weight,pods yield/fad, seed oil content % and protein yield/fad.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Gereogry surpassed the erect variety Giza 6 in pods, seeds and biological yield.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Material
- Gereogrye1
- Outcome
- pods, seeds and biological yield/fade1
- Direction
- surpassed significantlye1
- Comparator
- erect variety Giza 6e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e1“The spread variety Gereogry surpassed significantly the erect variety Giza 6 in yield (pods, seeds and biological yield/fad)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gereogry surpassed Giza 6 in plant height, and in number and dry weight of pods per plant.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Gereogrye1
- Outcome
- plant height, number and dry weight of pods/plante2
- Direction
- surpassed significantlye1
- Comparator
- erect variety Giza 6e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e1“The spread variety Gereogry surpassed significantly the erect variety Giza 6 in yield (pods, seeds and biological yield/fad)”
e2“yield components (plant height, number and dry weight of pods/plant, dry weight of seeds /plant,100- seed weight and shelling percentage)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gereogry surpassed Giza 6 in dry weight of seeds per plant, 100-seed weight and shelling percentage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Gereogrye1
- Outcome
- dry weight of seeds /plant,100- seed weight and shelling percentagee2
- Direction
- surpassed significantlye1
- Comparator
- erect variety Giza 6e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e1“The spread variety Gereogry surpassed significantly the erect variety Giza 6 in yield (pods, seeds and biological yield/fad)”
e2“yield components (plant height, number and dry weight of pods/plant, dry weight of seeds /plant,100- seed weight and shelling percentage)”
Claim · model-written summary
Gereogry surpassed Giza 6 in seed oil content and oil and protein yield per faddan.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- Gereogrye1
- Outcome
- seed oil content% and oil and protein yield/fade3
- Direction
- surpassed significantlye1
- Comparator
- erect variety Giza 6e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e1“The spread variety Gereogry surpassed significantly the erect variety Giza 6 in yield (pods, seeds and biological yield/fad)”
e3“yield quality (seed oil content% and oil and protein yield/fad”
Claim · model-written summary
The two peanut varieties did not differ in dry weight of straw, fodder yield or seed protein content.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Material
- two peanut varietiese0
- Outcome
- dry weight of straw/plant, fodder yield/fad and seedprotein content %e4
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e4“did not differ significantly from each other in dry weight of straw/plant, fodder yield/fad and seedprotein content %”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing phosphorus from 0 to 31 kg P2O5/fad increased peanut yield, yield components and yield quality.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- phosphorus levels from 0 to 31 kg P2O5/fade5
- Outcome
- yield, yield components and yield qualitye5
- Direction
- increasede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e5“Increasing phosphorus levels from 0 to 31 kg P2O5/fad increased significantly the forementioned yield, yield components and yield quality”
Claim · model-written summary
P levels had no significant effect on peanut seed protein content.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- P levelse6
- Outcome
- seed protein content %e6
- Direction
- non significant effecte6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e6“expect the non significant effect of P levels on seed protein content %”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers phosphorine or microbein increased the efficiency of peanut plants in utilizing phosphorus fertilizer.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae7
- Treatment
- bio fertilizers phosphorine or microbeine7
- Outcome
- efficiency of peanut plants in utilizingphosphours fertilizere7
- Direction
- increasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“bio fertilizers phosphorine or microbein increased the efficiency of peanut plants in utilizingphosphours fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield, yield components and yield quality of peanut were more pronounced with phosphorus fertilizer combined with biofertilizer than with P only.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae3
- Treatment
- phosphorus fertilizer combined with phosphorine or microbeine3
- Outcome
- yield, yield component and yield qualitye3
- Direction
- more pronouncede3
- Comparator
- P onlye3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The increment of yield, yield component and yield quality of peanutcvs was more pronounced and its values were higher when peanut plantsfertilized with phosphorus fertilizer combined with phosphorine or microbein than fertilized with P only”
Claim · model-written summary
The two biofertilizers, phosphorine and microbein, did not differ significantly in their effect on peanut yield and quality.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae3
- Treatment
- phosphorine or microbeine3
- Outcome
- yield, yield component and yield qualitye3
- Direction
- did not differ significantlye4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The increment of yield, yield component and yield quality of peanutcvs was more pronounced and its values were higher when peanut plantsfertilized with phosphorus fertilizer combined with phosphorine or microbein than fertilized with P only”
e4“the twobiofertilizers did not differ significantly in this respect”
Claim · model-written summary
Between the two higher P levels (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad) there was no significant difference in plant height, 100-seed weight and pods yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- two higher levels of P (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad)e5
- Outcome
- plant height, 100-seed weight, pods yield/fade5
- Direction
- nosignificant differencee5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e5“there was nosignificant difference between to two higher levels of P (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad) in plant height, 100-seed weight, pods yield/fad, seed oil content % and protein yield/fad”
Claim · model-written summary
Between the two higher P levels (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad) there was no significant difference in seed oil content and protein yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- two higher levels of P (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad)e5
- Outcome
- seed oil content % and protein yield/fade5
- Direction
- nosignificant differencee5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield, yield components and yield quality of two peanut varieties, Giza 6 as erect cv and Gereogry asspread cv”
e5“there was nosignificant difference between to two higher levels of P (23.25 and 31.0 kg P2O5/fad) in plant height, 100-seed weight, pods yield/fad, seed oil content % and protein yield/fad”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 160 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
174 papers more in this group
See all 178 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →phosphorus · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
16 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →phosphorus · quality: general · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.