Paper · 2016 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Salicylic Acid on Physico-chemical Attributes and Shelf Life of Tomato Fruits at Refrigerated Storage

Debashis Mandal; Lalhlimpuii Pautu; Tridip Kumar Hazarika; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato, the frequently consumed solanecous fruit vegetable faced rapid deterioration of fruit edible quality under ambient storage and though refrigerated storage has proved better retention but mostly with the outbreak of chilling injury. Therefore, attempt with salicylic acid, a safe phenolic having identified anti-ethylene effect, has been made during this study to evaluate its effect on shelf life and quality attributes of tomato fruit in refrigerated storage. Fruits of tomato variety Samrudhi at pink to light red stage were treated with different concentration of salicylic acid (0.2-1.2 mM) along with control (water dipped) and were kept at 4-5 C with 65-80% relative humidity in four replications following complete randomized design. Results showed salicylic acid (SA) treated fruits had better keeping quality than control though in concentration dependant manner. At 21 days after storage (DAS), fruits kept in control condition lost 13.69% of weight compared with the fruits treated with SA at 1.2 mM (5.79%). SA at 1-1.2 mM significantly reduced chilling injury (Chilling Injury Index/CII: 1.44-2.88) compared with fruits at control (CII: 4.98). Fruits at control showed deterioration in sugar content along with acidity and ascorbic acid. Further, it took rapid increase in pigment whereas, SA treated fruit in relatively higher concentration (0.8-1.2 mM), maintained fruit quality attributes with consistent intensification of carotenoids and lycopene even at 21 DAS. SA at 1.2 mM recorded maximum shelf life (32.75 days) to be considered as the best treatment having high maintenance of fruit edible qualities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid treated tomato fruit had better keeping quality than water dipped control fruit, depending on concentration.

Treatment
salicylic acid (SA)e0
Outcome
keeping qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salicylic acid (SA) treated fruits had better keeping quality than control though in concentration dependant manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–879 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 21 days, tomato fruit treated with 1.2 mM salicylic acid lost 5.79% weight versus 13.69% in controls.

Treatment
SA at 1.2 mMe0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
5.79%e0
Qualifier
13.69%e0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 21 days after storage (DAS), fruits kept in control condition lost 13.69% of weight compared with the fruits treated with SA at 1.2 mM (5.79%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1026 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 1–1.2 mM significantly reduced chilling injury relative to controls.

Treatment
SA at 1-1.2 mMe0
Outcome
chilling injurye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.44-2.88e0
Qualifier
CII: 4.98e0
Comparator
fruits at controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA at 1-1.2 mM significantly reduced chilling injury (Chilling Injury Index/CII: 1.44-2.88) compared with fruits at control (CII: 4.98)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit showed deterioration in sugar content, acidity and ascorbic acid.

Outcome
sugar content along with acidity and ascorbic acide0
Direction
deterioratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits at control showed deterioration in sugar content along with acidity and ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit showed a rapid increase in pigment.

Outcome
pigmente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, it took rapid increase in pigment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits at control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1182 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 0.8–1.2 mM maintained fruit quality attributes at 21 days.

Treatment
SA treated fruit in relatively higher concentration (0.8-1.2 mM)e0
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treated fruit in relatively higher concentration (0.8-1.2 mM), maintained fruit quality attributes with consistent intensification of carotenoids and lycopene even at 21 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1487 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 0.8–1.2 mM supported consistent carotenoid and lycopene intensification at 21 days.

Treatment
SA treated fruit in relatively higher concentration (0.8-1.2 mM)e0
Outcome
carotenoids and lycopenee0
Direction
intensificatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treated fruit in relatively higher concentration (0.8-1.2 mM), maintained fruit quality attributes with consistent intensification of carotenoids and lycopene even at 21 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1487 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA at 1.2 mM produced the maximum shelf life of 32.75 days.

Treatment
SA at 1.2 mMe0
Outcome
maximum shelf lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
32.75 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA at 1.2 mM recorded maximum shelf life (32.75 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1542 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–443 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

salicylic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

salicylic acid · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salicylic acid · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.