Paper · 2018 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Improving Vase Life and Keeping Quality of Cut Rose Flowers Using a Chlorine Dioxide and Sucrose Holding Solution

Young Boon Lee; Wan Soon Kim

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study investigated the antimicrobial effect of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) on the vase life of cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast'), which were maintained in a standard holding solution containing 2% sugar. The cut flowers were treated with preservative solutions of tap water (TW, control), distilled water (DW), 2% sucrose, and 2% sucrose with 2 μL∙L-1 to 8 μL∙L-1 ClO2. The addition of sucrose to DW caused early leaf chlorosis, and shortened the vase life of the flowers compared to TW or DW conditions, even though sucrose is a well-known carbohydrate source. The addition of 2 μL∙L-1 to 8 μL∙L-1 ClO2 to the sucrose solution significantly extended flower vase life about four days more than TW or DW conditions, and about six days more than the sucrose solution. The relative fresh weight and water uptake of the cut flowers were dramatically decreased in the sucrose solution without ClO2. Bacteria in the TW, DW, and sucrose holding solutions on day six were detected at counts of 2.3×105 CFU/L, 4.8×105 CFU/L, and 2.4×106 CFU/L, respectively. However, bacteria were not detected in the holding solution that contained ClO2. These results indicate an antimicrobial activity of ClO2 that is useful for extending the postharvest life of cut rose flowers in a vase solution that contains sucrose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ClO2 added to the sucrose solution extended vase life by about four days compared with tap or distilled water conditions.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
ClO2 to the sucrose solutione3
Outcome
flower vase lifee1
Direction
extendede1
Value
about four dayse1
Comparator
TW or DW conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly extended flower vase life about four days more than TW or DW conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–723 · show in text ↑
e3

“ClO2 to the sucrose solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ClO2 added to the sucrose solution extended vase life by about six days compared with the sucrose solution alone.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
ClO2 to the sucrose solutione3
Outcome
flower vase lifee1
Direction
extendede1
Value
about six dayse2
Comparator
the sucrose solutione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly extended flower vase life about four days more than TW or DW conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–723 · show in text ↑
e2

“and about six days more than the sucrose solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–774 · show in text ↑
e3

“ClO2 to the sucrose solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding sucrose to distilled water shortened vase life compared with tap or distilled water conditions.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
sucrose to DWe4
Outcome
vase life of the flowerse4
Direction
shortenede4
Comparator
TW or DW conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e4

“The addition of sucrose to DW caused early leaf chlorosis, and shortened the vase life of the flowers compared to TW or DW conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative fresh weight and water uptake of cut flowers decreased in the sucrose solution without ClO2.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Treatment
sucrose solution without ClO2e5
Outcome
relative fresh weight and water uptakee5
Direction
dramatically decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e5

“The relative fresh weight and water uptake of the cut flowers were dramatically decreased in the sucrose solution without ClO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria in the TW holding solution on day six were at 2.3×105 CFU/L.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Outcome
bacteriae6
Value
2.3×105 CFU/Le6
Qualifier
in the TWe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e6

“Bacteria in the TW, DW, and sucrose holding solutions on day six were detected at counts of 2.3×105 CFU/L, 4.8×105 CFU/L, and 2.4×106 CFU/L, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria in the DW holding solution on day six were at 4.8×105 CFU/L.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Outcome
bacteriae6
Value
4.8×105 CFU/Le6
Qualifier
on day sixe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e6

“Bacteria in the TW, DW, and sucrose holding solutions on day six were detected at counts of 2.3×105 CFU/L, 4.8×105 CFU/L, and 2.4×106 CFU/L, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria in the sucrose holding solution on day six were at 2.4×106 CFU/L.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Outcome
bacteriae6
Value
2.4×106 CFU/Le6
Qualifier
on day sixe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e6

“Bacteria in the TW, DW, and sucrose holding solutions on day six were detected at counts of 2.3×105 CFU/L, 4.8×105 CFU/L, and 2.4×106 CFU/L, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1057 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria were not detected in the holding solution that contained ClO2.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
Outcome
bacteriae7
Qualifier
were not detected in the holding solution that contained ClO2e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cut rose flowers (Rosa hybrida L. 'Beast')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–138 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, bacteria were not detected in the holding solution that contained ClO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1138 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that ClO2 has antimicrobial activity useful for extending postharvest life of cut rose flowers in sucrose vase solutions.

Taxon
cut rose flowerse1
Outcome
postharvest lifee1

Verbatim

e1

“These results indicate an antimicrobial activity of ClO2 that is useful for extending the postharvest life of cut rose flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1266 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.