Paper · 2024 · BMC Plant Biology

A novel efficient multi-walled carbon nanotubes/gibberellic acid composite for enhancement vase life and quality of Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Moonstone’

Hany M. El-Naggar; Shimaa M. Ali; Amira R. Osman

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The postharvest life of cut flowers is limited, which is a major challenge and varies greatly depending on plant varieties, cut flower stage, flower length of the harvested shoots, and storage conditions including postharvest treatments. As a result, improving the vase life and quality of cut flowers in regulating postharvest characteristics and overcoming these challenges is critical to the horticulture business. Novel engineered nanocomposites were created and tested for possible impacts on flower bud opening, postharvest life extension, longevity regulation, and preservation and enhancement of the strength and appearance of cut flowers. The experiment was conducted as a factorial experiment using a completely randomized design (CRD) with two factors. The first factor was two holding solutions (without or with sucrose at 20 gL −1 ). The second factor was 12 pulsing treatments for 24 h; distilled water as a control, 75 ppm GA 3 , multi-walled carbon nanotubes MWCNTs at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 ppm, and MWCNTs (10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 ppm)/GA 3 (75 ppm) composites; each treatment had 3 replicates, for a total of 72 experimental units. In the present study, gibberellic acid (GA 3 ) was synthesized in functionalized (MWCNT/GA 3 composites) as a novel antisenescence agent, and their effect on the vase life quality of cut rose flowers Rosa hybrida cv. ‘Moonstone’ was compared by assaying several parameters critical for vase life. The adsorption of GA 3 on MWCNTs was proven by performing FTIR spectroscopy which ensures that the formation of the MWCNTs/GA3 composite preserves the nanostructure and was examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The results revealed that sucrose in the holding solution showed a significant increase in fresh weight, flower diameter, and vase life by 10.5, 10.6, and 3.3% respectively. Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone, was critical for the significant increase in flower opening by 39.7 and 28.7%, and longevity by 34.4 and 23.2%, respectively, and significantly increased chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, anthocyanin, total phenolic content, and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity as compared to the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose holding solution increased fresh weight by 10.5%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose in the holding solutione0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose in the holding solution showed a significant increase in fresh weight, flower diameter, and vase life by 10.5, 10.6, and 3.3% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose holding solution increased flower diameter by 10.6%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose in the holding solutione0
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose in the holding solution showed a significant increase in fresh weight, flower diameter, and vase life by 10.5, 10.6, and 3.3% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose holding solution increased vase life by 3.3%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose in the holding solutione0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose in the holding solution showed a significant increase in fresh weight, flower diameter, and vase life by 10.5, 10.6, and 3.3% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose plus MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA3 75 ppm increased flower opening by 39.7%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm compositese0
Outcome
flower openinge0
Direction
increasee0
Value
39.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone, was critical for the significant increase in flower opening by 39.7 and 28.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose plus MWCNTs 20 ppm increased flower opening by 28.7%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
MWCNTs 20 ppm alonee0
Outcome
flower openinge0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone, was critical for the significant increase in flower opening by 39.7 and 28.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2034 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose plus MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA3 75 ppm increased longevity by 34.4%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm compositese0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
34.4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone, was critical for the significant increase in flower opening by 39.7 and 28.7%, and longevity by 34.4 and 23.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose plus MWCNTs 20 ppm increased longevity by 23.2%.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
MWCNTs 20 ppm alonee0
Outcome
longevitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone, was critical for the significant increase in flower opening by 39.7 and 28.7%, and longevity by 34.4 and 23.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll relative to control.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alonee1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, anthocyanin, total phenolic content, and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased anthocyanin, total phenolics, and DPPH scavenging activity relative to control.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alonee1
Outcome
anthocyanin, total phenolic content, and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, anthocyanin, total phenolic content, and 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl scavenging activity as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2087–2265 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applying sucrose with MWCNTs 20 ppm/GA 3 75 ppm composites or MWCNTs 20 ppm alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–1955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

sucrose · quality: phytochemicals · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · physiology: pigments · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · pest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.