Paper · 1995 · Agricultural and Food Science

Effect of soil compactness on the growth and quality of carrot

Liisa Pietola

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were performed in Southern Finland on three soil types: fine sand (1989-1991), clay (1989) and mull (1990-1991). The following soil mechanical treatments were applied to autumn ploughed land: soil loosening by ridge preparation (ridge distance 45 cm), rotary harrowing (to a depth of 20 cm, clay 15 cm), and soil compaction track by track by a tractor weighing 3 Mg (1 or 3 passes, wheel width 33 cm) before seed bed preparation. One plot was untreated. These treatments were set up in April (on clay in May) under moist soil conditions. Sprinkler irrigation (one application of 30 mm) was applied to clay and fine sand when soil moisture in top soil had decreased to around 50% of plant-available water capacity. PVC cylinders (r = 15 cm, h = 60 cm) were fixed in the experimental areas during the growing periods. At harvest, these cylinders were removed for specific analysis of tap and fibrous roots of carrot. Length and width of fibrous roots were quantified by image analysis in the USA. The impacts of soil loosening and partial compaction were determined by measuring soil physical parameters to a depth of 25 cm in mineral soils, and to greater depths in organic soil. Dry bulk densities of the plough layers increased with increasing tractor passes by 8%, 10% and 13% for fine sand, mull and clay soils, respectively. The lowest dry soil bulk density in the plough layer was obtained by rotary harrowing to a depth of 20 cm. Comparison of gamma ray transmission and gravimetric analysis indicated that dry soil bulk density was slightly lower when determined by gravimetric analysis. Increased soil bulk densities were reflected by increased water retention capacity (matric suction ≤ 10 kPa) and greater penetrometer resistance. Relatively similar increases in bulk density increased the penetrometer resistance much less in mull than in fine sand. In contrast, greater bulk densities in the mull soil affected soil air composition adversely by decreasing the O2 content to 10% when the subsoil had high wetness. In other soils, the lowest soil oxygen contents of 16-18% were recorded in early summer (compacted clay) and during periods of vigorous plant growth (fine sand) when soil water contents were high. Even though the highest degree of soil compactness (D) in a plough layer approached 93 (gravimetric) in all soils, only clay soil was compacted to a soil macro-porosity below 10% (pore diameter > 30 μm). Soil compaction promoted crop establishment and early growth as compared with loose soil beds. Optimum soil compactness for carrot yield (D = 82) was observed only in clay field where excess loosening or compaction affected yield quantity adversely at different stages of growth. During biomass accumulation, excessive penetrometer resistances limited tap root growth in compacted fine sand without irrigation. Water applications promoted shoot growth, but did not affect final shoot and tap root yield. Among the three soil types tested in this study, compaction of mull soil had the least effect on carrot growth and external quality. This paper presents evidence that the internal quality of carrots is only slightly affected by changes in soil physical properties, while the adverse effects of soil compaction on carrot external quality (short, deformed and conical tap roots with greater maximum diameters) are clear. Even though compacted clay soil greatly limited the biomass accumulations in the tap root, which had a high crude fibre content, the carotene (10 mg/100 g carrots) and sugar contents (5%) reached acceptable levels. The lowest carotene contents (4 mg/100 g carrots) were observed in loose mull, following a cool late summer in 1990. The effect of irrigation on carotene content varied from one year to another. High sugar and carotene contents appeared to respond to the high below-ground absorption surface. The fibrous root system of carrots, consisting of mostly very fine roots (diameter 0.15 mm), had total lengths of 150 m in loose fine sand at a soil depth of 0-50 cm (rotary harrowed), 200 m and 300 m in fine sand and mull soils subjected to 3 passes by a tractor wheel. The maximum dry weight (60 μg), length (1.2 cm) and surface area (0.05 cm2) of the fibrous root system per soil volume (cm3) were observed in compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cm, and also in relation to tap root dry weight. This suggests a capacity of carrot plant for high below-ground absorption potential and optimal biochemial maturation of tap root tissue even when surface soils are compacted. This is supported by higher leaf area, as the early shoot growth was promoted by partial soil compaction. Soil compaction affected the soil physical properties and carrot external quality in agreement with previous studies. Carotene and sugar contents appeared to be unaffected or were slightly increased in riper and firmer carrots of compacted soils. This is consistent with the earlier information about the internal quality of carrot which is shown to be highly dependent on genetic factors and developmental stage of carrot. The present study emphasizes the surface area of carrot fibrous root system as a beneficial factor for maintaining high levels of carotene and sugar contents in tap roots after partial soil compaction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry bulk density of the plough layer increased by 8% in fine sand with increasing tractor passes.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
tractor passese1
Outcome
Dry bulk densities of the plough layerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8%e1
Qualifier
fine sande1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry bulk densities of the plough layers increased with increasing tractor passes by 8%, 10% and 13% for fine sand, mull and clay soils, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry bulk density of the plough layer increased by 10% in mull soil with increasing tractor passes.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
tractor passese1
Outcome
Dry bulk densities of the plough layerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10%e1
Qualifier
mulle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry bulk densities of the plough layers increased with increasing tractor passes by 8%, 10% and 13% for fine sand, mull and clay soils, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry bulk density of the plough layer increased by 13% in clay soil with increasing tractor passes.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
tractor passese1
Outcome
Dry bulk densities of the plough layerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
13%e1
Qualifier
clay soilse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry bulk densities of the plough layers increased with increasing tractor passes by 8%, 10% and 13% for fine sand, mull and clay soils, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater bulk densities in mull soil decreased soil O2 content to 10% when the subsoil was wet.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
greater bulk densities in the mull soile4
Outcome
O2 contente4
Direction
decreasinge4
Value
10%e4
Qualifier
when the subsoil had high wetnesse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“greater bulk densities in the mull soil affected soil air composition adversely by decreasing the O2 content to 10% when the subsoil had high wetness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1892–2041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum soil compactness for carrot yield was observed only in the clay field, at D = 82.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
soil compactnesse6
Outcome
carrot yielde6
Value
D = 82e6
Qualifier
only in clay fielde6
Setting
clay fielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e6

“Optimum soil compactness for carrot yield (D = 82) was observed only in clay field where excess loosening or compaction affected yield quantity adversely at different stages of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2539–2722 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compacted clay soil gave carrot tap root carotene content of 10 mg/100 g, which reached an acceptable level.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
tap roote1
Outcome
carotenee1
Value
10 mg/100 g carrotse1
Setting
compacted clay soile1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even though compacted clay soil greatly limited the biomass accumulations in the tap root, which had a high crude fibre content, the carotene (10 mg/100 g carrots) and sugar contents (5%) reached acceptable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3367–3580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compacted clay soil gave carrot tap root sugar content of 5%, which reached an acceptable level.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
tap roote1
Outcome
sugar contentse1
Value
5%e1
Setting
compacted clay soile1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even though compacted clay soil greatly limited the biomass accumulations in the tap root, which had a high crude fibre content, the carotene (10 mg/100 g carrots) and sugar contents (5%) reached acceptable levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3367–3580 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest carotene content of carrot, 4 mg/100 g, was found in loose mull soil after a cool late summer in 1990.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Outcome
carotene contentse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
4 mg/100 g carrotse1
Qualifier
following a cool late summer in 1990e1
Setting
loose mulle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest carotene contents (4 mg/100 g carrots) were observed in loose mull, following a cool late summer in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3582–3697 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fibrous root dry weight of carrot was 60 μg per soil volume, in compacted or irrigated soil to 30 cm depth.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
fibrous root systeme1
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
maximume1
Value
60 μge1
Setting
compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum dry weight (60 μg), length (1.2 cm) and surface area (0.05 cm2) of the fibrous root system per soil volume (cm3) were observed in compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4146–4335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fibrous root length of carrot was 1.2 cm per soil volume, in compacted or irrigated soil to 30 cm depth.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
fibrous root systeme1
Outcome
lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
1.2 cme1
Setting
compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum dry weight (60 μg), length (1.2 cm) and surface area (0.05 cm2) of the fibrous root system per soil volume (cm3) were observed in compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4146–4335 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fibrous root surface area of carrot was 0.05 cm2 per soil volume, in compacted or irrigated soil to 30 cm depth.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
fibrous root systeme1
Outcome
surface areae1
Direction
maximume1
Value
0.05 cm2e1
Setting
compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum dry weight (60 μg), length (1.2 cm) and surface area (0.05 cm2) of the fibrous root system per soil volume (cm3) were observed in compacted or irrigated soil to a depth of 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4146–4335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotary harrowing to 20 cm gave the lowest dry soil bulk density in the plough layer.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
rotary harrowing to a depth of 20 cme2
Outcome
dry soil bulk density in the plough layere2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest dry soil bulk density in the plough layer was obtained by rotary harrowing to a depth of 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1452 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil bulk density increased water retention capacity (matric suction ≤ 10 kPa).

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Increased soil bulk densitiese3
Outcome
water retention capacitye3
Direction
increasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increased soil bulk densities were reflected by increased water retention capacity (matric suction ≤ 10 kPa) and greater penetrometer resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1757 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased soil bulk density gave greater soil penetrometer resistance.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Increased soil bulk densitiese3
Outcome
penetrometer resistancee3
Direction
greatere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increased soil bulk densities were reflected by increased water retention capacity (matric suction ≤ 10 kPa) and greater penetrometer resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1757 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive penetrometer resistance limited carrot tap root growth in compacted fine sand without irrigation during biomass accumulation.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
excessive penetrometer resistancese7
Outcome
tap root growthe7
Direction
limitede7
Setting
compacted fine sand without irrigatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“excessive penetrometer resistances limited tap root growth in compacted fine sand without irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2753–2853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction promoted carrot crop establishment and early growth compared with loose soil beds.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Soil compactione5
Outcome
crop establishment and early growthe5
Direction
promotede5
Comparator
loose soil bedse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil compaction promoted crop establishment and early growth as compared with loose soil beds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2444–2537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water applications promoted carrot shoot growth.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Water applicationse1
Outcome
shoot growthe1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water applications promoted shoot growth, but did not affect final shoot and tap root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2855–2946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water applications did not affect final carrot shoot and tap root yield.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Water applicationse1
Outcome
final shoot and tap root yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water applications promoted shoot growth, but did not affect final shoot and tap root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2855–2946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction had adverse effects on carrot external quality, with short, deformed and conical tap roots of greater maximum diameter.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
soil compactione1
Outcome
carrot external qualitye1
Direction
adversee1
Qualifier
short, deformed and conical tap roots with greater maximum diameterse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“the adverse effects of soil compaction on carrot external quality (short, deformed and conical tap roots with greater maximum diameters) are clear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3219–3365 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The surface area of the carrot fibrous root system is a beneficial factor for maintaining high carotene and sugar contents in tap roots after partial soil compaction.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Organ / stage
fibrous root systeme1
Outcome
carotene and sugar contentse1
Qualifier
surface area of carrot fibrous root system as a beneficial factore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and quality of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present study emphasizes the surface area of carrot fibrous root system as a beneficial factor for maintaining high levels of carotene and sugar contents in tap roots after partial soil compaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5088–5288 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: general · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

tillage · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.