Paper · 2009

Biocontrol of tomato verticillium wilt by using indigenous Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. isolates.

Hayfa Jabnoun‐Khiareddine; Mejda Daami‐Remadi; Fakher Ayed; et al.

15
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Endogenous Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. isolates were tested in vitro, in vivo and in situ for their antagonistic activity against Verticillium spp. causing tomato vascular wilt in Tunisia. Gliocladium catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. isolates reduced the radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpus in comparison to the untreated controls. Antagonistic potential of Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. against tested wilt agents showed intraand inter-specific variations. Additionally to the sclerotinization inhibitory activity and to the reduced abundance of resting structures of Verticillium spp. observed, compared to untreated controls, antagonists tested caused several alterations of Verticillium spp. mycelium at the confrontation zone. The germination of V. dahliae microsclerotia, exposed for 30 min to liquid cultures of antagonists tested and incubated at 20°C, was completely suppressed compared to the control microsclerotia treated with sterile distilled water. Furthermore, germinating microsclerotia dual cultured with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. became inable to germinate and mature microsclerotia progressively lost their typical dark colour. All tomato cv. ‘Ventura’ plants, when treated at planting with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. spore suspensions and inoculated with V. dahliae, showed after 60 days of culture under growth chamber conditions, reduced severity of Verticillium wilt in comparison to inoculated and untreated control plants. Plants treated with antagonists tested showed increased height and root and stem fresh weights in comparison to the inoculated and untreated control. The discoloration index, noted on tomato plants treated at planting by G. catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. and grown under greenhouse conditions, was significantly reduced compared to the untreated control. Plants treated with Penicillium sp. showed, after 90 days of culture, an increase of more than 40% of their roots and stem fresh weights in comparison to the untreated control. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. catenulatum reduced growth of the tested Verticillium species.

Treatment
Gliocladium catenulatume0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
Gliocladium catenulatumClonostachys rosea f. catenulatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clonostachys rosea f. catenulata
Clonostachys rosea f. catenulata · Second interactor · picture of the species(c) Michel Langeveld, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliocladium catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. isolates reduced the radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpus in comparison to the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. roseum reduced growth of the tested Verticillium species.

Treatment
G. roseume0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
G. roseumClonostachys roseae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clonostachys rosea
Clonostachys rosea · Second interactor(c) Michel Langeveld, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliocladium catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. isolates reduced the radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpus in comparison to the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium isolates reduced growth of the tested Verticillium species.

Treatment
Penicillium sp. isolatese0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
Penicillium sp.Penicilliume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpuse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gliocladium catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. isolates reduced the radial growth of V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum and V. tricorpus in comparison to the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonistic potential varied within and between Gliocladium and Penicillium species.

Interactor
Gliocladium spp.Gliocladiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Antagonistic potential of Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliocladium
Gliocladium · InteractorScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Antagonistic potential of Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. against tested wilt agents showed intraand inter-specific variations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonists inhibited sclerotinization and reduced Verticillium resting structures.

Treatment
antagonists testede1
Interactor
Verticillium spp.Verticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
resting structures of Verticillium spp.e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sclerotinization inhibitory activity and to the reduced abundance of resting structures of Verticillium spp. observed, compared to untreated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“antagonists tested caused several alterations of Verticillium spp. mycelium at the confrontation zone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonists altered Verticillium mycelium at confrontation zones.

Treatment
antagonists testede0
Interactor
Verticillium spp.Verticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
alterations of Verticillium spp. myceliume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antagonists tested caused several alterations of Verticillium spp. mycelium at the confrontation zone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist liquid cultures completely suppressed V. dahliae microsclerotia germination.

Treatment
liquid cultures of antagonists testede0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Outcome
germination of V. dahliae microsclerotiae0
Direction
completely suppressede0
Comparator
control microsclerotia treated with sterile distilled watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of V. dahliae microsclerotia, exposed for 30 min to liquid cultures of antagonists tested and incubated at 20°C, was completely suppressed compared to the control microsclerotia treated with sterile distilled water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual cultured germinating microsclerotia could no longer germinate.

Treatment
dual cultured with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp.e0
Interactor
Gliocladium spp.Gliocladiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
microsclerotiae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliocladium
Gliocladium · InteractorScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“germinating microsclerotia dual cultured with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. became inable to germinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature microsclerotia progressively lost their dark colour during antagonist dual culture.

Treatment
dual cultured with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp.e1
Outcome
typical dark coloure0
Direction
loste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mature microsclerotia progressively lost their typical dark colour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1208 · show in text ↑
e1

“dual cultured with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist spore suspensions reduced tomato wilt severity.

Material
cv. ‘Ventura’e0
Treatment
Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. spore suspensionse0
Interactor
V. dahliaeVerticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Second interactor
Gliocladium spp.Gliocladiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
severity of Verticillium wilte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
inoculated and untreated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gliocladium
Gliocladium · Second interactorScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tomato cv. ‘Ventura’ plants, when treated at planting with Gliocladium spp. and Penicillium sp. spore suspensions and inoculated with V. dahliae, showed after 60 days of culture under growth chamber conditions, reduced severity of Verticillium wilt in comparison to inoculated and untreated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antagonist treatment increased tomato height and root and stem fresh weights.

Treatment
antagonists testede0
Outcome
height and root and stem fresh weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inoculated and untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with antagonists tested showed increased height and root and stem fresh weights in comparison to the inoculated and untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G. catenulatum significantly reduced tomato discoloration index.

Treatment
G. catenulatume0
Interactor
G. catenulatumClonostachys rosea f. catenulatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
discoloration indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clonostachys rosea f. catenulata
Clonostachys rosea f. catenulata · Interactor · picture of the species(c) Michel Langeveld, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The discoloration index, noted on tomato plants treated at planting by G. catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. and grown under greenhouse conditions, was significantly reduced compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G. roseum significantly reduced tomato discoloration index.

Treatment
G. roseume0
Interactor
G. roseumClonostachys roseae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
discoloration indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Clonostachys rosea
Clonostachys rosea · Interactor(c) Michel Langeveld, some rights reserved (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The discoloration index, noted on tomato plants treated at planting by G. catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. and grown under greenhouse conditions, was significantly reduced compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium significantly reduced tomato discoloration index.

Treatment
Penicillium sp.e0
Interactor
Penicillium sp.Penicilliume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
discoloration indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The discoloration index, noted on tomato plants treated at planting by G. catenulatum, G. roseum and Penicillium sp. and grown under greenhouse conditions, was significantly reduced compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium increased tomato root and stem fresh weights by over 40%.

Treatment
Penicillium sp.e0
Interactor
Penicillium sp.Penicilliume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
roots and stem fresh weightse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
more than 40%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with Penicillium sp. showed, after 90 days of culture, an increase of more than 40% of their roots and stem fresh weights in comparison to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2063 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–20 · show in text ↑

Clonostachys rosea · Verticillium dahliae · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Penicillium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biocontrol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.