Paper · 2008 · Plant Health Progress

Does N or K Nutrition Affect Bronze Wilt in Field-Grown Cotton?

C. O. Gwathmey; M. A. Newman; C. H. Canaday

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bronze wilt (BW) is a disorder of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) that has reduced yields of susceptible cultivars, and may recur in future cultivar releases. Because BW may impair uptake or translocation of mineral nutrients, soil fertility may affect BW incidence or its impact on growth and development. A 3-year study was conducted to determine effects of N and K fertility and tillage on BW incidence and impact on growth and development of field-grown cotton. Incidence of BW was relatively low and unaffected by N or K fertility in this study with or without tillage. Neither N fertility nor tillage affected growth and development responses to BW, although high N fertility delayed appearance of secondary symptoms by an average of 3.5 days. Plant growth response to K fertility was suppressed by BW. Boll retention was reduced more than vegetative growth by BW, but this response was not mitigated by N or K fertilization. Leaves of BW plants had equivalent K concentration as normal plants, but 30% lower P, indicating that BW impaired P uptake or translocation. Results suggest that N and K fertilization are not useful methods to manage BW, but P nutrition merits further research. Accepted for publication 17 August 2008. Published 17 November 2008.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt incidence was low and unaffected by N or K fertility with or without tillage.

Treatment
N or K fertilitye0
Outcome
Incidence of BWe0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
with or without tillagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incidence of BW was relatively low and unaffected by N or K fertility in this study with or without tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertility did not affect cotton growth or development responses to bronze wilt.

Treatment
N fertilitye0
Outcome
growth and development responses to BWe0
Direction
Neithere0
Qualifier
BWe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertility nor tillage affected growth and development responses to BW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not affect cotton growth or development responses to bronze wilt.

Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
growth and development responses to BWe0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither N fertility nor tillage affected growth and development responses to BW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N fertility delayed secondary bronze wilt symptoms by 3.5 days on average.

Treatment
high N fertilitye0
Outcome
appearance of secondary symptomse0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3.5 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high N fertility delayed appearance of secondary symptoms by an average of 3.5 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt suppressed plant growth response to K fertility.

Treatment
BWe0
Outcome
Plant growth response to K fertilitye0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth response to K fertility was suppressed by BW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt reduced boll retention more than vegetative growth.

Treatment
BWe0
Outcome
Boll retentione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
vegetative growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Boll retention was reduced more than vegetative growth by BW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization did not mitigate the bronze wilt reduction in boll retention.

Treatment
Ne0
Outcome
this responsee0
Direction
not mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this response was not mitigated by N or K fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization did not mitigate the bronze wilt reduction in boll retention.

Treatment
K fertilizatione0
Outcome
this responsee0
Direction
not mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this response was not mitigated by N or K fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt leaves had equivalent K concentration to normal leaves.

Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
K concentratione0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
normal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of BW plants had equivalent K concentration as normal plants, but 30% lower P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt leaves had 30% lower P than normal leaves.

Organ / stage
Leavese0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
normal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaves of BW plants had equivalent K concentration as normal plants, but 30% lower P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronze wilt may impair P uptake or translocation.

Outcome
P uptake or translocatione0
Qualifier
BW impairede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indicating that BW impaired P uptake or translocation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N and K fertilization are not useful bronze wilt management methods.

Outcome
N and K fertilization are not useful methods to manage BWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results suggest that N and K fertilization are not useful methods to manage BW, but P nutrition merits further research.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

P nutrition merits further research for bronze wilt management.

Outcome
P nutrition merits further researche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P nutrition merits further research.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.