Paper · 2018 · Bangladesh Agronomy Journal

Seedling Growth of Wheat as Affected by Soil Salinity

E Sultana; MA Hasan; S Sikder; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate seedling growth of wheat under saline condition. Thirty wheat genotypes were grown in trays containing different levels of salinity (Control, 6 and 12 dSm-1) during October to December, 2013. Seedling emergence index, shoot and root length, shoot and root dry weight were found to be reduced with the increases of soil salinity level but the degree of reduction were not similar for all wheat genotypes. Salt tolerance index (STI) also indicated a wide difference in salt tolerance among the wheat genotypes. Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, BAW 1185, BAW 1186, BAW 1187, BAW 1189 and BAW 1193 were more salt tolerance while BAW 1177, BAW 1190 and BAW 1198 showed greater salt sensitivity than the other wheat genotypes at 6 dS m-1. However, at 12 dS m-1, Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, Sufi and BAW 1184 showed more salt tolerance and BAW 1183, BAW 1190, BAW 1192, BAW 1194 and BAW 97 provided greater stress sensitivity among the testing wheat genotypes. Considering both saline stress Sourav, Gourav and Shatabdi were found to be salt tolerant and BAW 1190 was saline sensitive wheat genotypes.Bangladesh Agron. J. 2017, 20(2): 53-66

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced wheat seedling emergence index, shoot and root length, and shoot and root dry weight, with genotype-dependent reductions.

Treatment
soil salinity levele0
Outcome
Seedling emergence index, shoot and root length, shoot and root dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
degree of reduction were not similar for all wheat genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling emergence index, shoot and root length, shoot and root dry weight were found to be reduced with the increases of soil salinity level but the degree of reduction were not similar for all wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt tolerance index showed wide differences among wheat genotypes.

Outcome
wide difference in salt tolerancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt tolerance index (STI) also indicated a wide difference in salt tolerance among the wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–548 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 dS m-1, Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, BAW 1185, BAW 1186, BAW 1187, BAW 1189 and BAW 1193 were more salt tolerant than other wheat genotypes.

Material
Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, BAW 1185, BAW 1186, BAW 1187, BAW 1189 and BAW 1193e0
Outcome
more salt tolerancee0
Qualifier
6 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, BAW 1185, BAW 1186, BAW 1187, BAW 1189 and BAW 1193 were more salt tolerance while BAW 1177, BAW 1190 and BAW 1198 showed greater salt sensitivity than the other wheat genotypes at 6 dS m-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 dS m-1, BAW 1177, BAW 1190 and BAW 1198 were more salt sensitive than other wheat genotypes.

Material
BAW 1177, BAW 1190 and BAW 1198e0
Outcome
greater salt sensitivitye0
Qualifier
6 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BAW 1177, BAW 1190 and BAW 1198 showed greater salt sensitivity than the other wheat genotypes at 6 dS m-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 dS m-1, Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, Sufi and BAW 1184 were more salt tolerant.

Material
Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, Sufi and BAW 1184e0
Outcome
more salt tolerancee0
Qualifier
12 dS m-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 12 dS m-1, Sourav, Gourav, Shatabdi, Sufi and BAW 1184 showed more salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 12 dS m-1, BAW 1183, BAW 1190, BAW 1192, BAW 1194 and BAW 97 showed greater salt sensitivity.

Material
BAW 1183, BAW 1190, BAW 1192, BAW 1194 and BAW 97e0
Outcome
greater stress sensitivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BAW 1183, BAW 1190, BAW 1192, BAW 1194 and BAW 97 provided greater stress sensitivity among the testing wheat genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–984 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across both salinity stresses, Sourav, Gourav and Shatabdi were salt tolerant.

Material
Sourav, Gourav and Shatabdie0
Outcome
salt tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering both saline stress Sourav, Gourav and Shatabdi were found to be salt tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across both salinity stresses, BAW 1190 was salt sensitive.

Material
BAW 1190e0
Outcome
saline sensitivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BAW 1190 was saline sensitive wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1124 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

327 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.