Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Horticulture farm, S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner (Rajasthan) during kharif, 2013 with sixteen treatment combinations including four levels of organic manures (Control; FYM @ 10 t ha-1; FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1; FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1+ bio-fertilizers) and four levels of inorganic fertilizers (Control, 100% R D of NPK, NPK + S, NPK + S + Zn) in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The results indicated that combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1). Similarly yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior neck thickness.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior diameter of bulb.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior average weight.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior bulb yield.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior total bulb yield.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior net return.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic manures gave superior B:C ratio.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of FYM @ 5 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 + Bio-fertilizers, among the different treatments of organic manures proved significantly superior over rest of the treatments in respect to yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.069cm), diameter of bulb (4.22cm), average weight (98.80g), bulb yield(15.81kg plot-1), total bulb yield (219.56 q ha-1) ; net return (Rs. 2,01,705/- ha-1) and B:C ratio (3.26:1)”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high neck thickness.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- neck thicknesse0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 1.056cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high diameter of bulb.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- diameter of bulbe0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 4.29cme0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high average weight.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- average weighte0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 96.14ge0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high bulb yield.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- bulb yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 15.38 kg plot-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high total bulb yield.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- total bulb yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 213.64 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high net return.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- Rs 195489 ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK, S and Zn treatment gave high B: C ratio.
- Taxon
- kharif oniont0
- Treatment
- NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe0
- Direction
- highe0
- Value
- 3.21: 1e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“yield attributes viz., neck thickness(1.056cm), diameter of bulb(4.29cm), average weight(96.14g), bulb yield (15.38 kg plot-1), total bulb yield (213.64 q ha-1); net return (Rs 195489 ha-1), B: C ratio (3.21: 1) in onion bulb were significantly high in treatment of NPK,S & Zn @ 100:50:100:20 & 10 kg ha-1”
t0“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →zinc atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →inoculation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
89 papers more in this group
See all 93 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
290 papers more in this group
See all 294 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.