Paper · 2018 · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering

Effect of Exogenous Cd Pollution on Red Soil and Wheat

Lin Ma; Miao Liu

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cadmium is a toxic element and highly mobile in soil. Cadmium can inhibit the growth and development of crops, leading to reduced yield and quality. The objectives of this experiment were (1) to determine the effect of exogenous Cd pollution on Cd concentration in red soil and (2) to measure the effect of exogenous Cd pollution on Cd uptake and yield of wheat. The wheat cultivar was Wanmai 52. The study was done in Yujiang county, Yingtan city, Jiangxi province. Three Cd concentrations of 0, 0.3, 0.6 mg/kg were applied in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Cadmium concentrations were determined with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The results indicated that exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on the grain yield, straw biomass, and total above ground biomass. The total soil Cd concentration increased significantly after Cd contamination. The Cd concentration in the 0.6 mg/kg treatment was nearly three times that in the 0.3 mg/kg treatment. Exogenous Cd pollution significantly increased Cd uptake by wheat grain. The uptake increased as Cd concentration increased. The effects of Cd pollution on Cd uptake by wheat and above ground biomass were not significant. In conclusion, the control of exogenous Cd input to soil is the fundamental way to reduce soil Cd pollution and improve crop quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

Material
Wheatt0
Treatment
exogenous Cd pollutione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on the grain yield, straw biomass, and total above ground biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on straw biomass.

Treatment
exogenous Cd pollutione0
Outcome
straw biomasse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on the grain yield, straw biomass, and total above ground biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on total above-ground biomass.

Treatment
exogenous Cd pollutione0
Outcome
total above ground biomasse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that exogenous Cd pollution had no significant effect on the grain yield, straw biomass, and total above ground biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Cd concentration increased significantly after contamination.

Treatment
Cd contaminatione0
Outcome
total soil Cd concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The total soil Cd concentration increased significantly after Cd contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Cd concentration at 0.6 mg/kg was nearly three times that at 0.3 mg/kg.

Treatment
0.6 mg/kg treatmente0
Outcome
Cd concentratione0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
nearly three timese0
Comparator
0.3 mg/kg treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The Cd concentration in the 0.6 mg/kg treatment was nearly three times that in the 0.3 mg/kg treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous Cd pollution significantly increased Cd uptake by wheat grain.

Treatment
Exogenous Cd pollutione0
Outcome
Cd uptake by wheat graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous Cd pollution significantly increased Cd uptake by wheat grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1071 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain Cd uptake rose as Cd concentration increased.

Treatment
Cd concentratione0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake increased as Cd concentration increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A separate statement says Cd pollution effects on wheat Cd uptake were not significant.

Treatment
Cd pollutione0
Outcome
Cd uptake by wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Cd pollution on Cd uptake by wheat and above ground biomass were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A separate statement says Cd pollution effects on above-ground biomass were not significant.

Treatment
Cd pollutione0
Outcome
above ground biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of Cd pollution on Cd uptake by wheat and above ground biomass were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend controlling exogenous Cd input to soil to reduce soil pollution and improve crop quality.

Outcome
control of exogenous Cd input to soile0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
improve crop qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control of exogenous Cd input to soil is the fundamental way to reduce soil Cd pollution and improve crop quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 6 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

110 papers: 20 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

pollution · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

pollution · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pollution · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.