Paper · 2025 · Global Change Biology

Joint Ozone Pollution and Climate Warming Reduce Yield but Enhance Grain Protein Content in a Resistant Wheat Variety

Yansen Xu; Jiale Tang; Jiaxuan Xia; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ozone (O 3 ) pollution and climate warming jointly threaten crop productivity and undermine global food security. However, their combined effects on wheat under real‐world conditions are not well understood, limiting the potential for adaptation. Here, we investigated yield and grain protein of a major wheat variety under joint elevated O 3 and warming manipulations in 3 years (2021–2023), using a real‐world simulation with a free‐air controlled enrichment (FACE) facility. We found that O 3 pollution reduced grain yield mainly by limiting a carbon source via accelerated flag leaf senescence and declined leaf area index. Warming enhanced nitrogen uptake before heading and thereby mitigated leaf senescence and increased grain protein content. This wheat variety showed lower responses to independent elevated O 3 and warming than the varieties studied in the literature. Cultivating this tolerant wheat variety resulted in only 6% yield losses under joint O 3 pollution and warming, while increasing grain nitrogen content by 9%. These findings demonstrate that it is critical to breed wheat varieties that optimize high yield in tandem with adaptation to air pollution and climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated O3 pollution reduced grain yield of wheat.

Treatment
O 3 pollutione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O 3 pollution reduced grain yield mainly by limiting a carbon source via accelerated flag leaf senescence and declined leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O3 pollution reduced grain yield mainly by limiting a carbon source through accelerated flag leaf senescence and declined leaf area index.

Treatment
O 3 pollutione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
limiting a carbon source via accelerated flag leaf senescence and declined leaf area indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“O 3 pollution reduced grain yield mainly by limiting a carbon source via accelerated flag leaf senescence and declined leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming enhanced nitrogen uptake before heading in wheat.

Treatment
Warminge0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake before headinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming enhanced nitrogen uptake before heading and thereby mitigated leaf senescence and increased grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming mitigated leaf senescence in wheat.

Treatment
Warminge0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming enhanced nitrogen uptake before heading and thereby mitigated leaf senescence and increased grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming increased grain protein content in wheat.

Treatment
Warminge0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Warming enhanced nitrogen uptake before heading and thereby mitigated leaf senescence and increased grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat variety showed lower responses to independent elevated O3 than varieties studied in the literature.

Treatment
independent elevated O 3e0
Outcome
responsese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the varieties studied in the literaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This wheat variety showed lower responses to independent elevated O 3 and warming than the varieties studied in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The wheat variety showed lower responses to independent warming than varieties studied in the literature.

Treatment
warminge0
Outcome
responsese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the varieties studied in the literaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This wheat variety showed lower responses to independent elevated O 3 and warming than the varieties studied in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tolerant wheat variety had only 6% yield loss under joint O3 pollution and warming.

Treatment
joint O 3 pollution and warminge0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivating this tolerant wheat variety resulted in only 6% yield losses under joint O 3 pollution and warming, while increasing grain nitrogen content by 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tolerant wheat variety increased grain nitrogen content by 9% under joint O3 pollution and warming.

Treatment
joint O 3 pollution and warminge0
Outcome
grain nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivating this tolerant wheat variety resulted in only 6% yield losses under joint O 3 pollution and warming, while increasing grain nitrogen content by 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Resistant Wheat Variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that it is critical to breed wheat varieties that combine high yield with adaptation to air pollution and climate change.

Outcome
breed wheat varieties that optimize high yield in tandem with adaptation to air pollution and climate changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is critical to breed wheat varieties that optimize high yield in tandem with adaptation to air pollution and climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1205 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

heat · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

heat · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

50 papers: 26 positive, 24 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

ozone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 7 positive, 63 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Ozone still lowered yield under elevated CO2.

    Growth, light interception and yield responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under elevated CO2 and O3 in open‐top chambers · 1998 · compared with corresponding elevated CO 2 treatments in the absence of elevated O 3

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

pollution · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

pollution · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

heat · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

ozone · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.