Paper · 2018 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

Initial Development of Soybean as a Bioindicator of the Potential of Leaching 2,4-D In Red Latosol

Vinícius Melo da Silva; Tonny José Araújo Da Silva; Maria Aparecida Peres de Oliveira; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of leaching 2,4-D in Red Latosol using soybean as a bioindicator plant, to verify the residual effect of the distribution of the herbicide in the soil on the initial development of the plant. The experimental design is a 5 × 11 × 2 triple factorial model, with 5 treatments of water slides (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 mm) applied by a rainfall simulator. The depth of 11 layers (0-5, 5 -10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45, 45-50, and 50-55 cm) were mounted on soil columns using two groups (in the absence and the presence of the 2,4-D herbicide dimethylamine by application at a dose of 1500 g a.i. ha -1 ), with four replicates, making 440 experimental plots. The residual effect of the herbicide was evaluated by seedling emergence speed index, total seedling emergence percentage and plant height evaluation. The results demonstrated that the effect of 2,4-D herbicide distribution along the soil profile induces increases in the initial development of soybean when compared to the control treatment. However, the residual 2,4-D in the soil decreases with 80- and 100-mm sheets that have greater herbicide leaching potential beyond the depth range of the soil columns. Keywords: Residual effect, Seedling emergence, Glycine max.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 2,4-D along the soil profile increased initial soybean development versus control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
2,4-D herbicide distribution along the soil profilee0
Outcome
initial development of soybeane0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrated that the effect of 2,4-D herbicide distribution along the soil profile induces increases in the initial development of soybean when compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual soil 2,4-D decreased with 80- and 100-mm water sheets, which had greater leaching potential beyond the columns.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
80- and 100-mm sheetse0
Outcome
residual 2,4-D in the soile0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
greater herbicide leaching potential beyond the depth range of the soil columnse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“the residual 2,4-D in the soil decreases with 80- and 100-mm sheets that have greater herbicide leaching potential beyond the depth range of the soil columns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1252 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

35 papers: 20 positive, 15 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

herbicide · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 60 positive, 62 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.