Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean terminal height was most susceptible to 2,4-D exposure between 448 and 1,719 GDD, V1 to R4.

A claim from Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean terminal height was most susceptible to 2,4-D exposure between 448 and 1,719 GDD, V1 to R4.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
V1 to R4e0
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
terminal plant heighte0
Direction
most susceptiblee0
Qualifier
between 448 and 1,719 GDDe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of terminal plant height, soybean was most susceptible to 2,4-D between 448 and 1,719 GDD, or from V1 to R4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–630

Title

Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D

Alanna B. Scholtes; Benjamin P. Sperry; Daniel B. Reynolds; et al. Weed Technology 2019. doi:10.1017/wet.2019.39

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c9fbbd0dff97b6a542af903c8ae11438902fa7596a7e47e74c24f23c16d6e9c8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

35 papers: 20 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.