Abstract
The field experiment on cotton productivity and leaf reddening as influenced by nutrition management for targeted yield was conducted during growing seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur, Karnataka on medium deep black soil under irrigation. Three yield targets (3, 4 and 5 t kapas yield ha-1) based site specific nutrient management (SSNM) along with four leaf reddening management (LRM) treatments (S1 - Vermicompost @ 2.5 t ha-1 in seed line, S2 - S1 + MgSO4 10 kg ha-1 in seed line, S3 - S1 + MgSO4 25 kg ha-1 in seed line, and S4 - MgSO4 25 kg ha-1 in seed line + foliar nutrition of 1% MgSO4 +19:19:19 + 1% KNO3 trice during flowering, boll development and boll bursting stages) besides recommended control were tested using RCBD. Plloed data on the experimental results revealed that SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis), PUE (60.81 on pooled basis), KUE (31.37 on pooled basis), had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis) and IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
SSNM for a 5 t ha-1 target plus S4 gave significantly higher NUE of 14.30.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
- Outcome
- NUEe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis)”
t0“Cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
The same management gave significantly higher PUE of 60.81.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“PUE (60.81 on pooled basis)”
t0“Cotton”
e1“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis), PUE (60.81 on pooled basis), KUE (31.37 on pooled basis), had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis) and IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same management gave significantly higher KUE of 31.37.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“KUE (31.37 on pooled basis)”
t0“Cotton”
e1“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis), PUE (60.81 on pooled basis), KUE (31.37 on pooled basis), had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis) and IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same management gave higher IPUE of 115.0.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis)”
t0“Cotton”
e1“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis), PUE (60.81 on pooled basis), KUE (31.37 on pooled basis), had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis) and IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same management gave higher IKUE of 24.6 to 24.7.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- S4e1
- Outcome
- IKUE valuese0
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 24.6 to 24.7e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis)”
t0“Cotton”
e1“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis), PUE (60.81 on pooled basis), KUE (31.37 on pooled basis), had higher IPUE (115.0 on pooled basis) and IKUE values (24.6 to 24.7 on pooled basis)”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →climate site · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.