Paper · 1995 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Efficacy of phosphate carriers as foliar fertilizer on rainfed upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Murugapillai Venugopal; P. P. Tarhalkar; Jagvir Singh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy season (kharifJ of 1991 and 1992 to study the effectiveness of foliar fertilization using different phosphate carriers. viz single superphosphate, diammonium phosphate, and the granular, liquid, zincated as well as potash-enriched ammonium polyphosphate, on 'JKHY 1' hybrid upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under rainfed condition. The foliar absorption continued till 72-96 hr after spraying, The P absorption with single superphosphate was only half of that with diammonium phosphate of polyphosphate (except zincated ammonium polyphosphate). Out of the P applied as liquid ammonium polyphosphate or diammonium phosphate. 75-80% was absorbed within 96 hr after the first spray, but the absorption pattern was different; the initial rate being faster with diammonium phosphate. Application of 6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%. nitrogen uptake by 12-14%, phosphate uptake by 24-28% and apparent recovery or N and P by 17-18%, but did not improve the nutrient-utilization efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar absorption continued until 72–96 hours after spraying.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Outcome
foliar absorptione0
Value
72-96 hre0

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar absorption continued till 72-96 hr after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P absorption from single superphosphate was half that from diammonium phosphate or most polyphosphates.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
single superphosphatee0
Outcome
P absorptione0
Direction
only halfe0
Qualifier
except zincated ammonium polyphosphatee0
Comparator
diammonium phosphate of polyphosphatee0

Verbatim

e0

“The P absorption with single superphosphate was only half of that with diammonium phosphate of polyphosphate (except zincated ammonium polyphosphate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid ammonium polyphosphate achieved 75–80% P absorption within 96 hours after first spray.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
liquid ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
P appliede0
Value
75-80%e0
Qualifier
within 96 hr after the first spraye0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the P applied as liquid ammonium polyphosphate or diammonium phosphate. 75-80% was absorbed within 96 hr after the first spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diammonium phosphate achieved 75–80% P absorption within 96 hours and had the faster initial rate.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
diammonium phosphatee0
Outcome
P appliede0
Direction
fastere0
Value
75-80%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Out of the P applied as liquid ammonium polyphosphate or diammonium phosphate. 75-80% was absorbed within 96 hr after the first spray, but the absorption pattern was different; the initial rate being faster with diammonium phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ammonium polyphosphate increased seed cotton yield by 14–18%.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14-18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar treatment increased nitrogen uptake by 12–14%.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12-14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%. nitrogen uptake by 12-14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar treatment increased phosphate uptake by 24–28%.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
phosphate uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24-28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%. nitrogen uptake by 12-14%, phosphate uptake by 24-28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar treatment increased apparent recovery of N and P by 17–18%.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
apparent recovery or N and Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17-18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 6% of the nitrogen and 25% of the total recommended dose of phosphorus through foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%. nitrogen uptake by 12-14%, phosphate uptake by 24-28% and apparent recovery or N and P by 17-18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar treatment did not improve nutrient utilization efficiency.

Taxon
upland cottont0
Treatment
foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphatee0
Outcome
nutrient-utilization efficiencye0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of ammonium polyphosphate increased the seed-cotton yield hy 14-18%. nitrogen uptake by 12-14%, phosphate uptake by 24-28% and apparent recovery or N and P by 17-18%, but did not improve the nutrient-utilization efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–97 · show in text ↑

ammonium polyphosphate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

33 papers: 22 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 43 positive, 7 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.