Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SSNM for a 5 t ha-1 target plus S4 gave significantly higher NUE of 14.30.

A claim from Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management on the Performance of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Nutrient Dynamics · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM for a 5 t ha-1 target plus S4 gave significantly higher NUE of 14.30.

Treatment
SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4)e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.30e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSNM for 5 t ha-1 yield target and supplementary nutrition of MgSO4 both to soil and to foliage and foliar application of major nutrients (19:19:19 and KNO3) (S4) recorded significantly higher NUE (14.30 on pooled basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–1044
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–75

Title

Effect of Site Specific Nutrient Management on the Performance of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Nutrient Dynamics

Vinayak Hosamani; B.M. Chittapur; Mall ikarjun; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.424

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-aeffaee26ee562b2f365cde5226e8cd55c8d28a963e363d710e440a0f0a9986b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

climate site · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.