Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Intensified Pulse Rotations Buildup Pea Rhizosphere Pathogens in Cereal and Pulse Based Cropping Systems

Yining Niu; Luke D. Bainard; William E. May; et al.

20
claims
36
verbatim quotes
44
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The association of plants and microbial communities is crucial for crop production, and host plants influence the composition of rhizosphere microbiomes. Pulse crops play an important role in the development of sustainable cropping systems. In this study, we determined the shifts in the fungal community of pea (Pisum sativum L.) rhizosphere, as influenced by the frequency of pulses in rotation, using high throughput sequencing. Six cropping systems containing pea (P), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik., L), hybrid canola (Brassica napus L., C), wheat (Triticum aestivum L., W), and oat (Avena sativa L., O) in different intensities were tested. The fungal communities were assessed at the flowering stage in the fourth and fifth year of the 4-year rotations. Cropping system had a significant impact on the composition of the rhizosphere fungal community, and the effect of crop rotation sequence was greater and explained more of the variation than the effect of previous crops. The rotation with consecutive pulses (WPLP) decreased fungal evenness and increased the proportion of pathotrophs. Fusarium was a dominant and ubiquitous pathotrophic genus. Olpidium virulentus, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani, F. graminearum, and Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP), the exception being F. solani which was not promoted by lentil. Reads of O. virulentus and B. cinerea were most abundant in pea preceded by lentil followed by the reads of Mortierella elongata in pea preceded by wheat. Pea consistently had higher grain yield when grown in diversified rotations including wheat, canola/lentil, and oat than rotations with two repeated crops (canola or pea). Cropping system affected the soil physicochemical properties, and soil pH was the main driver of fungal community shift. No evidence of beneficial microorganisms involvement in plant productivity was observed, but the high abundance of pathotrophs in pulse intensified rotations suggests the possibility of pathogen buildup in the soil with increasing pulse frequency. Diversifying rotation sequences minimized disease risk and increased pea production, in this study. Careful selection of plant species appears as a strategy for the management of rhizosphere fungal communities and the maintenance of crop production system’s health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system significantly affected pea rhizosphere fungal community composition.

Treatment
Cropping systeme0
Outcome
composition of the rhizosphere fungal communitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cropping system had a significant impact on the composition of the rhizosphere fungal community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation sequence explained more pea rhizosphere fungal variation than previous crops.

Treatment
crop rotation sequencee0
Outcome
variatione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
previous cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of crop rotation sequence was greater and explained more of the variation than the effect of previous crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consecutive pulses decreased fungal evenness in pea rhizospheres.

Treatment
rotation with consecutive pulses (WPLP)e0
Outcome
fungal evennesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rotation with consecutive pulses (WPLP) decreased fungal evenness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consecutive pulses increased the proportion of pea rhizosphere pathotrophs.

Treatment
rotation with consecutive pulses (WPLP)e0
Outcome
proportion of pathotrophse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rotation with consecutive pulses (WPLP) decreased fungal evenness and increased the proportion of pathotrophs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium was a dominant and ubiquitous pea rhizosphere pathotroph.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
dominant and ubiquitous pathotrophic genuse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium was a dominant and ubiquitous pathotrophic genus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olpidium virulentus was generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations.

Treatment
pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)e0
Interactor
Olpidium virulentusOlpidium virulentuse0pathogen
Outcome
Olpidium virulentuse0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olpidium virulentus, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani, F. graminearum, and Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis cinerea was generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations.

Treatment
pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)e0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Olpidium virulentus, Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium solani, F. graminearum, and Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium solani was generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations, except with lentil.

Treatment
pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)e0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium solanie0
Direction
more abundante0
Qualifier
the exception being F. solani which was not promoted by lentile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium solani, F. graminearum, and Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP), the exception being F. solani which was not promoted by lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. graminearum was generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations.

Treatment
pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)e0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
F. graminearume0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. graminearum, and Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria eichhorniae was generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations.

Treatment
pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)e0
Interactor
Alternaria eichhorniaeAlternaria eichhorniaee0pathogen
Outcome
Alternaria eichhorniaee0
Direction
more abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria eichhorniae were generally more abundant in pulse intensive rotations (WPLP, WLOP, and WPOP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. virulentus reads were most abundant in pea preceded by lentil.

Treatment
pea preceded by lentile0
Interactor
O. virulentusOlpidium virulentuse0pathogen
Outcome
Reads of O. virulentuse0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reads of O. virulentus and B. cinerea were most abundant in pea preceded by lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cinerea reads were most abundant in pea preceded by lentil.

Treatment
pea preceded by lentile0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
B. cinereae0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reads of O. virulentus and B. cinerea were most abundant in pea preceded by lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1482 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortierella elongata reads were most abundant in pea preceded by wheat.

Treatment
pea preceded by wheate0
Interactor
Mortierella elongataLinnemannia elongatae0other
Outcome
reads of Mortierella elongatae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Interactorzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reads of Mortierella elongata in pea preceded by wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea grain yield was higher in diversified rotations than rotations with two repeated crops.

Treatment
diversified rotations including wheat, canola/lentil, and oate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
rotations with two repeated crops (canola or pea)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pea consistently had higher grain yield when grown in diversified rotations including wheat, canola/lentil, and oat than rotations with two repeated crops (canola or pea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cropping system affected soil physicochemical properties in the pea rotation study.

Treatment
Cropping systeme0
Outcome
soil physicochemical propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cropping system affected the soil physicochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was the main driver of fungal community shifts.

Compound
soil pHe0
Outcome
fungal community shifte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH was the main driver of fungal community shift”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No beneficial microorganism contribution to pea productivity was observed.

Interactor
beneficial microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
plant productivitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No evidence of beneficial microorganisms involvement in plant productivity was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified rotation sequences minimized disease risk.

Treatment
Diversifying rotation sequencese0
Outcome
disease riske0
Direction
minimizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversifying rotation sequences minimized disease risk and increased pea production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2096–2179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diversified rotation sequences increased pea production.

Treatment
Diversifying rotation sequencese0
Outcome
pea productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversifying rotation sequences minimized disease risk and increased pea production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2096–2179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Careful plant species selection was proposed to manage rhizosphere fungi and maintain cropping-system health.

Outcome
Careful selection of plant speciese0
Qualifier
management of rhizosphere fungal communities and the maintenance of crop production system’s healthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Careful selection of plant species appears as a strategy for the management of rhizosphere fungal communities and the maintenance of crop production system’s health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus var. napus · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Lens culinaris · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.