Paper · 2002

Optimizing yield and quality of canola seed with balanced fertilization in the Parkland Zone of western Canada

S. S. Malhi; D. Leach

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A number of field experiments were conducted from 1998 to 2001 (or are underway) in northeastern Saskatchewan to determine the effects of various rates (0 to 30 kg S/ha), sources (sulphate S – potassium sulphate and ammonium sulphate; and elemental S – ES 90 and ES 95), times (autumn, sowing, bolting and flowering) and methods (incorporation, sideband, seedrow, topdress and foliar) of S application, ratios of fertilizer N:S (0 to 150 kg N/ha and 0 to 30 kg S/ha) and cultivars (Quantum – Brassica napus, AC Excel – Brassica napus, Maverick – Brassica rapa and AC Parkland – Brassica rapa) on seed yield and quality of canola. The S deficiency on canola can be corrected and seed yields restored with application of sulphate-S fertilizer in the growing season, substantially until bolting growth stage and moderately at early flowering stage. There was no significant increase in seed yield from the elemental S fertilizers in the initial year of application. Even after three annual applications, the elemental S fertilizers had seed yields lower than the sulphate-S fertilizers in many cases particularly when the S fertilizers were applied in spring. Autumn-applied elemental S usually had greater seed yield than the spring-applied elemental S. Autumn-applied ammonium sulphate produced lower seed yield than spring-applied ammonium sulphate in some cases. For higher N application rates, there was a need of increased amount of fertilizer S to adequately meet the S requirements of canola. The severity of S deficiency, increase in seed yield of canola from applied S and seed quality varied with canola cultivars. In general, Quantum had the highest seed yield, followed by AC Excel, Maverick and AC Parkland. Application of S fertilizer also increased oil content in canola seed. In conclusion, seed yield and quality of canola can be optimized with proper S fertilizer management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing-season sulphate-S application corrected sulfur deficiency and restored seed yields, especially through bolting.

Organ / stage
bolting growth stagee0
Treatment
application of sulphate-S fertilizere0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
restorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S deficiency on canola can be corrected and seed yields restored with application of sulphate-S fertilizer in the growing season, substantially until bolting growth stage and moderately at early flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate-S application at early flowering moderately restored seed yields.

Organ / stage
early flowering stagee0
Treatment
application of sulphate-S fertilizere0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
restorede0
Qualifier
moderatelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The S deficiency on canola can be corrected and seed yields restored with application of sulphate-S fertilizer in the growing season, substantially until bolting growth stage and moderately at early flowering stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elemental S fertilizers did not significantly increase seed yield in their first application year.

Treatment
elemental S fertilizerse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
no significant increasee0
Qualifier
initial year of applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant increase in seed yield from the elemental S fertilizers in the initial year of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three annual applications, elemental S often yielded less than sulphate-S, especially with spring applications.

Treatment
elemental S fertilizerse0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in many cases particularly when the S fertilizers were applied in springe0
Comparator
sulphate-S fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even after three annual applications, the elemental S fertilizers had seed yields lower than the sulphate-S fertilizers in many cases particularly when the S fertilizers were applied in spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-applied elemental S usually gave greater seed yield than spring-applied elemental S.

Treatment
Autumn-applied elemental Se0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
spring-applied elemental Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Autumn-applied elemental S usually had greater seed yield than the spring-applied elemental S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn-applied ammonium sulphate produced lower seed yield than spring application in some cases.

Treatment
Autumn-applied ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in some casese0
Comparator
spring-applied ammonium sulphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Autumn-applied ammonium sulphate produced lower seed yield than spring-applied ammonium sulphate in some cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen application rates required more fertilizer sulfur to meet canola sulfur requirements.

Treatment
higher N application ratese0
Outcome
fertilizer Se0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For higher N application rates, there was a need of increased amount of fertilizer S to adequately meet the S requirements of canola.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola cultivars varied in sulfur-deficiency severity, yield response to sulfur, and seed quality.

Material
canola cultivarse0
Outcome
severity of S deficiency, increase in seed yield of canola from applied S and seed qualitye0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The severity of S deficiency, increase in seed yield of canola from applied S and seed quality varied with canola cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantum had the highest seed yield among the cultivars.

Material
Quantume0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
AC Excel, Maverick and AC Parklande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, Quantum had the highest seed yield, followed by AC Excel, Maverick and AC Parkland.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizer increased canola seed oil content.

Organ / stage
seede0
Treatment
S fertilizere0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of S fertilizer also increased oil content in canola seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1789 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.