Paper · 2018 · Bragantia

Nitrogen recovery efficiency for corn intercropped with palisade grass

Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de Almeida; José Laércio Favarin; Rafael Otto; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Intercropping corn and palisade grass is a technique to increase straw production, soil C contents, nutrient cycling and crop yield. However, concerns arise from nitrogen (N) uptake by the intercropping crop causing reduction in the yield of the corn. Our objective was to evaluate N recovery efficiency (NRE), and the N dynamics in the soil-plant system in corn intercropped with palisade grass. A field trial was carried out in Bahia, Brazil, evaluating two cropping systems: corn (monoculture) and corn intercropped with palisade grass sowed between rows on the same day as the corn crop, with four replicates in a completely randomized block design. Nitrogen (150 kg∙ha–1of 15N-urea) was applied at sowing to determine NRE, which means the amounts of N-fertilizer uptake in corn and palisade grass, the amounts of N-fertilizer in soil and the 15N-fertilizer balance. Neither the NRE (63.3% in monoculture and 57.2% in intercropping) nor corn grain yield (9,800 kg∙ha–1 in monoculture and 9,671 kg∙ha–1 in intercropping) was affected by intercropping, which accumulated only 2.1 kg∙ha–1 of N-fertilizer or 1.4% N rate. In addition, palisade grass yielded 2,265 kg∙ha–1 of dry matter. The balance indicated that 82.4% of N-fertilizer was recovered in the monoculture and 86.9% in the intercropping. Intercropping palisade grass does not affect grain yield or N corn nutrition and has the potential to increase straw production contributing to maintenance of no-till.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not affect corn nitrogen recovery efficiency.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
NREe0
Direction
Neithere0
Value
57.2%e0
Qualifier
63.3%e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither the NRE (63.3% in monoculture and 57.2% in intercropping) nor corn grain yield (9,800 kg∙ha–1 in monoculture and 9,671 kg∙ha–1 in intercropping) was affected by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not affect corn grain yield.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
was affectede0
Value
9,671 kg∙ha–1e0
Qualifier
9,800 kg∙ha–1e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither the NRE (63.3% in monoculture and 57.2% in intercropping) nor corn grain yield (9,800 kg∙ha–1 in monoculture and 9,671 kg∙ha–1 in intercropping) was affected by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1053 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped palisade grass accumulated 2.1 kg per hectare fertilizer nitrogen.

Taxon
palisade grassUrochloa brizanthae1
Outcome
N-fertilizere0
Value
2.1 kg∙ha–1e0
Qualifier
1.4% N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping, which accumulated only 2.1 kg∙ha–1 of N-fertilizer or 1.4% N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn intercropped with palisade grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Palisade grass produced 2,265 kg per hectare dry matter.

Taxon
palisade grassUrochloa brizanthae0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Value
2,265 kg∙ha–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa brizantha
Urochloa brizantha · Taxonhttp://www.hear.org/starr/imageusepolicy.htm This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Attribution: Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“palisade grass yielded 2,265 kg∙ha–1 of dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monoculture recovered 82.4% of fertilizer nitrogen.

Outcome
N-fertilizer was recoverede0
Value
82.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“82.4% of N-fertilizer was recovered in the monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn (monoculture)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–496 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping recovered 86.9% of fertilizer nitrogen.

Outcome
N-fertilizer was recoverede1
Value
86.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“86.9% in the intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1300 · show in text ↑
e1

“The balance indicated that 82.4% of N-fertilizer was recovered in the monoculture and 86.9% in the intercropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1300 · show in text ↑
e2

“corn intercropped with palisade grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded palisade grass intercropping can increase straw production.

Treatment
Intercropping palisade grasse0
Outcome
straw productione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping palisade grass does not affect grain yield or N corn nutrition and has the potential to increase straw production contributing to maintenance of no-till.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1468 · show in text ↑

intercropping · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.