Abstract
Present study is aimed to comparatively investigate the response of two ploidy levels of wheat including a tetraploid (Triticum turgidum L.) and a hexaploid (Triticum aestivum L.) wheat to different durations of flooding stress. Wheat seedlings were exposed to flooding stress for 0, 3, 6 and 9 days. Results showed that all flooding treatments significantly decreased the shoot and root length, and chlorophyll content of both species of wheat. The decrease in chlorophyll content of tetraploid wheat was more than that of hexaploid one. In both species, ADH activity of root was significantly increased under flooding stress, where the increase was more in hexaploid wheat. Flooding stress did not significantly affect root and shoot water content, root porosity, and shoot protein content of any wheat species. Tetraploid and hexaploid wheat used different mechanisms for better tolerance of flooding condition, where tetraploid wheat increased the proline content but in hexaploid wheat, an increase in soluble sugar content was observed.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding significantly reduced shoot and root lengths in both wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- all flooding treatmentse0
- Outcome
- shoot and root lengthe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all flooding treatments significantly decreased the shoot and root length, and chlorophyll content of both species of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding significantly reduced chlorophyll content in both wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- all flooding treatmentse0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all flooding treatments significantly decreased the shoot and root length, and chlorophyll content of both species of wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll content decreased more in tetraploid than hexaploid wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- tetraploid wheate0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- hexaploid onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The decrease in chlorophyll content of tetraploid wheat was more than that of hexaploid one.”
Claim · model-written summary
Root ADH activity significantly rose under flooding in both wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- flooding stresse0
- Outcome
- ADH activity of roote0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both species, ADH activity of root was significantly increased under flooding stress”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Root ADH activity increased more in hexaploid wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- hexaploid wheate0
- Outcome
- ADH activity of roote0
- Direction
- moree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In both species, ADH activity of root was significantly increased under flooding stress, where the increase was more in hexaploid wheat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding did not significantly affect root or shoot water content in either wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Flooding stresse0
- Outcome
- root and shoot water contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flooding stress did not significantly affect root and shoot water content, root porosity, and shoot protein content of any wheat species.”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding did not significantly affect root porosity in either wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Flooding stresse0
- Outcome
- root porositye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flooding stress did not significantly affect root and shoot water content, root porosity, and shoot protein content of any wheat species.”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding did not significantly affect shoot protein content in either wheat species.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Flooding stresse0
- Outcome
- shoot protein contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flooding stress did not significantly affect root and shoot water content, root porosity, and shoot protein content of any wheat species.”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding increased proline content in tetraploid wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- tetraploid wheate0
- Treatment
- flooding conditione1
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tetraploid wheat increased the proline content”
e1“Tetraploid and hexaploid wheat used different mechanisms for better tolerance of flooding condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding increased soluble sugar content in hexaploid wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- hexaploid wheate0
- Treatment
- flooding conditione1
- Outcome
- soluble sugar contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in hexaploid wheat, an increase in soluble sugar content was observed”
e1“Tetraploid and hexaploid wheat used different mechanisms for better tolerance of flooding condition”
The same questions in other papers
flooding · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
flooding · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →flooding · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →flooding · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →flooding · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.