Paper · 2010

Post-anthesis salinity and waterlogging and their combination affect uptake of potassium and sodium ions and starch accumulation in grain of wheat

Weixing Cao

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat cultivars Yangmai 12 and Huaimai 17 were selected to investigate the effects of post-anthesis salt application(ST),waterlogging(WL) or both(SW) on the absorption of K+ and Na+ ions,grain dry matter accumulation,as well as on redistribution of sugars and of amino acids.Contents of Na+ in leaves and stems and sheaths increased rapidly,while contents of K+ and the ratio of K+/Na+ decreased under the ST and SW treatments.This led to an ion imbalance between K+ and Na+ in wheat vegetative organs.WL,ST and SW reduced the contents of total soluble sugars,sucrose and of free amino acids in the grains.In stressed plants,both the rates of remobilization of total soluble sugar and of 'pre-anthesis' stored total soluble sugars of in vegetative organs were reduced.Consequently,grain filling was inhibited,and grain weight and starch content reduced.The impacts on these traits were much more severe under ST and SW treatments than in the control and WL treatments.SW and ST showed more severe impacts in Huaimai 17 than Yangmai 12,where grain weight was reduced by 60.3% and 61.1% in Huaimai 17,and by 46.6% and 43.7% in Yangmai 12,respectively.In addition,Yangmai 12 was more sensitive to ST than to the SW treatment,while Huaimai 17 was more sensitive to SW than ST conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ content or ratio increased under salt and combined stress.

Organ / stage
leaves and stems and sheathse0
Treatment
ST and SW treatmentse0
Outcome
Na+e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contents of Na+ in leaves and stems and sheaths increased rapidly,while contents of K+ and the ratio of K+/Na+ decreased under the ST and SW treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K+ content or ratio decreased under salt and combined stress.

Organ / stage
leaves and stems and sheathse0
Treatment
ST and SW treatmentse0
Outcome
K+e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contents of Na+ in leaves and stems and sheaths increased rapidly,while contents of K+ and the ratio of K+/Na+ decreased under the ST and SW treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K+/Na+ content or ratio decreased under salt and combined stress.

Organ / stage
leaves and stems and sheathse0
Treatment
ST and SW treatmentse0
Outcome
K+/Na+e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contents of Na+ in leaves and stems and sheaths increased rapidly,while contents of K+ and the ratio of K+/Na+ decreased under the ST and SW treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging, salt, and combined stress reduced grain soluble sugars, sucrose, and free amino acids.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
WL,ST and SWe0
Outcome
total soluble sugars,sucrose and of free amino acidse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WL,ST and SW reduced the contents of total soluble sugars,sucrose and of free amino acids in the grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress reduced remobilization of total soluble sugars and pre-anthesis stored sugars.

Treatment
stressed plantse0
Outcome
rates of remobilization of total soluble sugar and of 'pre-anthesis' stored total soluble sugarse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In stressed plants,both the rates of remobilization of total soluble sugar and of 'pre-anthesis' stored total soluble sugars of in vegetative organs were reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress inhibited or reduced grain filling.

Outcome
grain fillinge0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently,grain filling was inhibited,and grain weight and starch content reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress inhibited or reduced grain weight.

Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently,grain filling was inhibited,and grain weight and starch content reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress inhibited or reduced starch content.

Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently,grain filling was inhibited,and grain weight and starch content reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt and combined stress had more severe impacts than control and waterlogging.

Treatment
ST and SW treatmentse0
Outcome
impacts on these traitse0
Direction
much more severee0
Comparator
control and WL treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The impacts on these traits were much more severe under ST and SW treatments than in the control and WL treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SW reduced grain weight in Huaimai 17 by 60.3%.

Material
Huaimai 17e0
Treatment
SWe0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SW and ST showed more severe impacts in Huaimai 17 than Yangmai 12,where grain weight was reduced by 60.3% and 61.1% in Huaimai 17,and by 46.6% and 43.7% in Yangmai 12,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST reduced grain weight in Huaimai 17 by 61.1%.

Material
Huaimai 17e0
Treatment
STe0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SW and ST showed more severe impacts in Huaimai 17 than Yangmai 12,where grain weight was reduced by 60.3% and 61.1% in Huaimai 17,and by 46.6% and 43.7% in Yangmai 12,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SW reduced grain weight in Yangmai 12 by 46.6%.

Material
Yangmai 12e0
Treatment
SWe0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SW and ST showed more severe impacts in Huaimai 17 than Yangmai 12,where grain weight was reduced by 60.3% and 61.1% in Huaimai 17,and by 46.6% and 43.7% in Yangmai 12,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST reduced grain weight in Yangmai 12 by 43.7%.

Material
Yangmai 12e0
Treatment
STe0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SW and ST showed more severe impacts in Huaimai 17 than Yangmai 12,where grain weight was reduced by 60.3% and 61.1% in Huaimai 17,and by 46.6% and 43.7% in Yangmai 12,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yangmai 12 was more sensitive to ST than to SW treatment.

Material
Yangmai 12e0
Treatment
STe0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
SW treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition,Yangmai 12 was more sensitive to ST than to the SW treatment,while Huaimai 17 was more sensitive to SW than ST conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Huaimai 17 was more sensitive to SW than to ST conditions.

Material
Huaimai 17e0
Treatment
SWe0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
ST conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In addition,Yangmai 12 was more sensitive to ST than to the SW treatment,while Huaimai 17 was more sensitive to SW than ST conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–146 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

salinity · physiology: ion balance · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 7 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.