Paper · 2018 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Phytochemical and Morpho-physiological Responses of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni to Different Planting Beds and Mycorrhizal Fungi inoculation (Glomus intraradices N.C. Schenck & G.S. Sm.)

AR Etminan; AR Etminan; A Qaderi; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Background: The composition of the planting beds and its microorganisms has a very important role on the establishment, growth and phytochemical performance of medicinal plants. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different planting beds and inoculation of mycorrhizal fungus on the changes of stevioside, rebaudioside, and morpho-physiological traits of stevia. Methods: This study was conducted in a factorial experiment based on randomized complete blocks design (RCBD) with 10 treatments and 4 replications. The first factor consisted of inoculum and non-inoculum treatment of Glomus intraradices, and the second factor was the different combination of peat moss, coco peat, perlite and soil as planting beds. Results: Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation significantly increased the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter, number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C. Also, different combination of planting beds had a significant effect on the plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weight, root dry/fresh weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the combination of peat moss + coco peat + soil (2:1:1) with mycorrhizal fungi inoculation among the treatments had the highest positive effect on leaf dry weight and glycoside carbohydrates in stevia plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation significantly increased the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter, number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation significantly increased the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter, number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased root dry weight.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation significantly increased the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter, number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
Mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal fungi inoculation significantly increased the plant height, number of lateral branches, stem and root diameter, number of leaves, leaf fresh/dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting-bed combinations significantly affected plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weight, with direction unstated.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
different combination of planting bedse0
Outcome
plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, different combination of planting beds had a significant effect on the plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weight, root dry/fresh weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting-bed combinations significantly affected root dry/fresh weight, with direction unstated.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
different combination of planting bedse0
Outcome
root dry/fresh weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, different combination of planting beds had a significant effect on the plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weight, root dry/fresh weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting-bed combinations significantly affected content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C, with direction unstated.

Taxon
Stevia rebaudiana BertoniStevia rebaudianat0
Treatment
different combination of planting bedse0
Outcome
content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia rebaudiana
Stevia rebaudiana · TaxonEthel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, different combination of planting beds had a significant effect on the plant height, stem dry/fresh weight, leaf fresh weight, root dry/fresh weight, and content of stevioside, rebaudioside A and C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1204 · show in text ↑
t0

“Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The peat moss, coco peat and soil combination with mycorrhizal inoculation gave the highest positive leaf dry weight effect.

Taxon
steviaSteviae0
Treatment
peat moss + coco peat + soil (2:1:1) with mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of this study showed that the combination of peat moss + coco peat + soil (2:1:1) with mycorrhizal fungi inoculation among the treatments had the highest positive effect on leaf dry weight and glycoside carbohydrates in stevia plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same bed and mycorrhizal treatment gave the highest positive effect on glycoside carbohydrates.

Taxon
steviaSteviae0
Treatment
peat moss + coco peat + soil (2:1:1) with mycorrhizal fungi inoculatione0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
glycoside carbohydratese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Stevia
Stevia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ethel Aardvark · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results of this study showed that the combination of peat moss + coco peat + soil (2:1:1) with mycorrhizal fungi inoculation among the treatments had the highest positive effect on leaf dry weight and glycoside carbohydrates in stevia plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1463 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Stevia rebaudianaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Stevia rebaudianaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Stevia rebaudianaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Stevia rebaudianaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · SteviaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.