Abstract
Although,chickpea isnitrogen fixing crop but water scarcity under rain-fed condition reduces its nodulation process severely and nutrients use efficiency too. An experiment was carried out regarding the combined effect of nipping as well as foliar applied fertilizers on yield and yield components of chickpea under rain-fed conditions. Nipping and foliar application of nutrients significantly improved number of pods plant-1, biological yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%) and final grain yield (kg ha-1). However, non-significant influence was seen in 1000-grain weight and number of grains pod-1. Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping was found to be the best interaction among others which significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment. Nipping along with foliar application of NPKcan be practiced in chickpea for higher profitability.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping and foliar nutrients significantly improved chickpea pods per plant, biological yield, and harvest index.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- Nipping and foliar application of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1, biological yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%)e0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nipping and foliar application of nutrients significantly improved number of pods plant-1, biological yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%) and final grain yield (kg ha-1)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping and foliar nutrients significantly improved chickpea grain yield.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Nipping and foliar application of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- final grain yield (kg ha-1)e0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nipping and foliar application of nutrients significantly improved number of pods plant-1, biological yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%) and final grain yield (kg ha-1)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nipping and foliar nutrients had a nonsignificant influence on chickpea thousand-grain weight and grains per pod.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- nipping and foliar application of nutrientst1
- Outcome
- 1000-grain weight and number of grains pod-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“non-significant influence was seen in 1000-grain weight and number of grains pod-1”
t0“chickpea”
t1“nipping and foliar application of nutrients”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea branches per plant to 11.30 versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nippinge0
- Outcome
- number of branches plant-1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11.30e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping was found to be the best interaction among others which significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea pods per plant to 115.36 versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nippingt1
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 115.36e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment”
t0“chickpea”
t1“Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea height to 59.48cm versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nippinge1
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 59.48cme0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment”
t0“chickpea”
e1“Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea grain yield to 2338.9 kg ha-1 versus control.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nippinge1
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2338.9 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- control treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment”
t0“chickpea”
e1“Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend nipping with foliar NPK for higher chickpea profitability.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Outcome
- Nipping along with foliar application of NPKcan be practiced in chickpea for higher profitabilitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Nipping along with foliar application of NPKcan be practiced in chickpea for higher profitability”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.