Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea pods per plant to 115.36 versus control.

A claim from Influence of nipping and foliar application of nutrients on growth and yield of chickpea in rain-fed condition · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK foliar application with nipping significantly increased chickpea pods per plant to 115.36 versus control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nippingt1
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
115.36e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased number of branches plant-1 (11.30), number of pods plant-1(115.36), plant height(59.48cm) and grain yield(2338.9 kg ha-1) as compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–899
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88
t1

“Foliar application of N PK (20:20:20) @2.5 kg ha-1 × nipping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–660

Title

Influence of nipping and foliar application of nutrients on growth and yield of chickpea in rain-fed condition

Ejaz Ahmad Khan; Iqtidar Hussain; Sheryar .; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2018. doi:10.18805/lr-342

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-9dd1f5c8b71ddcb275a6e2e2a052a57c31ace47e3b1a43487b7d360492df13e2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.