Paper · 2018 · Agronomy

Heat Shock-Induced Resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Okabe) Young et al. via Heat Shock Transcription Factors in Tomato

Nur Akbar Arofatullah; Morifumi Hasegawa; Sayuri Tanabata; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We investigated the role of heat shock transcription factors (Hsfs) during induction of defense response by heat-shock treatment (HST) in tomato. Leaf disease symptoms were significantly reduced at 12 and 24 h after HST, consistent with upregulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes PR1a2 and PR1b1 peaking at 24 h after treatment. These genes were upregulated at the treatment application site, but not in untreated leaves. In contrast to HST, inoculation of the first leaf induced systemic upregulation of acidic PR genes in uninoculated second leaves. Furthermore, heat shock element motifs were found in upstream regions of PR1a2, PR1b1, Chitinase 3, Chitinase 9, Glucanase A, and Glucanase B genes. Upregulation of HsfA2 and HsfB1 peaked at 6 h after HST, 6 h earlier than salicylic acid accumulation. Foliar spray of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor geldanamycin (GDA) induced PR gene expression comparable to that after HST. PR gene expression and defense response against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) decreased when combining HST with Hsfs inhibitor KRIBB11. The Hsfs and PR gene expression induced by heat or GDA, together with the suppression of heat shock-induced resistance (HSIR) against Pst by KRIBB11, suggested a direct contribution of Hsfs to HSIR regulation in tomato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock reduced leaf disease symptoms at 12 and 24 hours.

Treatment
HSTe0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatot0pathogen
Outcome
Leaf disease symptomse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
12 and 24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf disease symptoms were significantly reduced at 12 and 24 h after HST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Okabe) Young et al. via Heat Shock Transcription Factors in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR1a2 expression rose after heat shock and peaked at 24 hours.

Treatment
treatmente0
Gene
PR1a2e0
Outcome
upregulatione0
Direction
upregulatione0
Qualifier
24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes PR1a2 and PR1b1 peaking at 24 h after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR1b1 expression rose after heat shock and peaked at 24 hours.

Treatment
treatmente0
Gene
PR1b1e0
Outcome
upregulatione0
Direction
upregulatione0
Qualifier
24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes PR1a2 and PR1b1 peaking at 24 h after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR genes rose at the heat-treated site but not untreated leaves.

Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
genese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Comparator
untreated leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These genes were upregulated at the treatment application site, but not in untreated leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-leaf inoculation systemically raised acidic PR gene expression in uninoculated second leaves.

Organ / stage
uninoculated second leavese0
Treatment
inoculation of the first leafe0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatot1pathogen
Outcome
acidic PR genese0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation of the first leaf induced systemic upregulation of acidic PR genes in uninoculated second leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
t1

“Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat shock element motifs occurred upstream of PR1a2, PR1b1, Chitinase 3, Chitinase 9, Glucanase A and Glucanase B.

Gene
PR1a2, PR1b1, Chitinase 3, Chitinase 9, Glucanase A, and Glucanase Be0
Outcome
heat shock element motifse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heat shock element motifs were found in upstream regions of PR1a2, PR1b1, Chitinase 3, Chitinase 9, Glucanase A, and Glucanase B genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HsfA2 expression peaked six hours after heat shock.

Treatment
HSTe0
Gene
HsfA2e0
Outcome
Upregulatione0
Direction
Upregulatione0
Qualifier
6 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upregulation of HsfA2 and HsfB1 peaked at 6 h after HST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HsfB1 expression peaked six hours after heat shock.

Treatment
HSTe0
Gene
HsfB1e0
Outcome
Upregulatione0
Direction
Upregulatione0
Qualifier
6 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upregulation of HsfA2 and HsfB1 peaked at 6 h after HST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid accumulation peaked six hours after Hsf induction.

Outcome
salicylic acid accumulatione0
Qualifier
6 h earliere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“6 h earlier than salicylic acid accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Geldanamycin spray induced PR gene expression comparable to heat shock.

Treatment
Foliar spray of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor geldanamycin (GDA)e0
Outcome
PR gene expressione0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
HSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor geldanamycin (GDA) induced PR gene expression comparable to that after HST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRIBB11 combined with heat shock reduced PR gene expression.

Treatment
combining HST with Hsfs inhibitor KRIBB11e0
Outcome
PR gene expressione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PR gene expression and defense response against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) decreased when combining HST with Hsfs inhibitor KRIBB11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KRIBB11 combined with heat shock reduced defense against Pseudomonas.

Treatment
combining HST with Hsfs inhibitor KRIBB11e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoPseudomonas syringae pv. tomatoe0pathogen
Outcome
defense response against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PR gene expression and defense response against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) decreased when combining HST with Hsfs inhibitor KRIBB11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer direct Hsf contribution to heat shock-induced resistance regulation.

Gene
Hsfse0
Outcome
HSIR regulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggested a direct contribution of Hsfs to HSIR regulation in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1303 · show in text ↑

heat · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

heat · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.