Abstract
The present work entitled as “Effect of substitution of nutritional source through organics and bio-inputs on corm and cormel production in gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. American Beauty” was carried out at the college farm, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Venkataramannagudem. The corm and cormel characters were significantly influenced by different nutritional sources. Application of 75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter +PSB + KMB exhibited significant superiority in respect of corm characters such as number of corms per mother corm, corm diameter, corm weight, number of cormels produced per mother corm, cormel weight per plant and corm number per hectare.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Corm and cormel characters of gladiolus were significantly influenced by different nutritional sources.
- Taxon
- Gladiolus grandiflorus L.
Gladiolus grandifloruse0 - Treatment
- different nutritional sourcese2
- Outcome
- corm and cormel characterse2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. American Beauty”
e2“The corm and cormel characters were significantly influenced by different nutritional sources”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF + 25% RDN combination with vermicompost and bio-inputs gave significant superiority in corm number, corm diameter and corm weight.
- Taxon
- Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandifloruse0
- Material
- cv. American Beautye0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter +PSB + KMBe3
- Outcome
- number of corms per mother corm, corm diameter, corm weighte3
- Direction
- significant superioritye3
- Setting
- college farm, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Venkataramannagudeme1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. American Beauty”
e1“was carried out at the college farm, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Venkataramannagudem”
e3“Application of 75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter +PSB + KMB exhibited significant superiority in respect of corm characters such as number of corms per mother corm, corm diameter, corm weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF + 25% RDN combination with vermicompost and bio-inputs gave significant superiority in cormel number, cormel weight and corm number per hectare.
- Taxon
- Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandifloruse0
- Material
- cv. American Beautye0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter +PSB + KMBe3
- Outcome
- number of cormels produced per mother corm, cormel weight per plant and corm number per hectaree4
- Direction
- significant superioritye3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. American Beauty”
e3“Application of 75% RDF + 25% RDN through vermicompost + Azotobacter +PSB + KMB exhibited significant superiority in respect of corm characters such as number of corms per mother corm, corm diameter, corm weight”
e4“number of cormels produced per mother corm, cormel weight per plant and corm number per hectare”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusPositive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.