Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Response of integrated nutrient management on vegetative growth and flowering characters of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus) cv. white prosperity

Mithilesh Kumar; Arun Kumar Singh; Ravi Pratap Singh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in Randomized Block Design with 13 treatments and 3 replications. The experimental findings was revealed that the treatment T11 (75% RDF+ FYM +Azotobacter +PSB)showed better response viz. early sprouting, number of sprouts, number of leaves, fresh and dry weight of plant inand T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB) better response viz. plant height, early spike initiation, opening of first floret, duration of flowering, length of spike, diameter of spike, length of rachis, number of florets per spike, diameter of florets, spike yield of gladiolus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave a better response for gladiolus sprouting, sprouts and leaves.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
T11 (75% RDF+ FYM +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
early sprouting, number of sprouts, number of leavese0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T11 (75% RDF+ FYM +Azotobacter +PSB)showed better response viz. early sprouting, number of sprouts, number of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–269 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 gave a better response for fresh and dry plant weight in gladiolus.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
T11 (75% RDF+ FYM +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of plante0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment T11 (75% RDF+ FYM +Azotobacter +PSB)showed better response viz. early sprouting, number of sprouts, number of leaves, fresh and dry weight of plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 gave a better response for gladiolus plant height.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB) better response viz. plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 gave a better response for gladiolus spike initiation, first-floret opening and flowering duration.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Outcome
early spike initiation, opening of first floret, duration of floweringe0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB) better response viz. plant height, early spike initiation, opening of first floret, duration of flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 gave a better response for gladiolus spike length, diameter and rachis length.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Outcome
length of spike, diameter of spike, length of rachise0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB) better response viz. plant height, early spike initiation, opening of first floret, duration of flowering, length of spike, diameter of spike, length of rachis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 gave a better response for gladiolus florets per spike, floret diameter and spike yield.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB)e0
Outcome
number of florets per spike, diameter of florets, spike yielde0
Direction
better responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T12 (75% RDF+ VC +Azotobacter +PSB) better response viz. plant height, early spike initiation, opening of first floret, duration of flowering, length of spike, diameter of spike, length of rachis, number of florets per spike, diameter of florets, spike yield of gladiolus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–579 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · GladiolusResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusPositive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.