Abstract
The studies on spring soft wheat Bazhenka bred in FARC North-East were done in 2015-1017 under conditions of Kirov region. The scheme of the first field experiment included four variants of sowing data - early (by workability of soil), and three more subsequent data with an interval of five days. The scheme of the second experiment included four variants of harvesting data: early one (when 70% of plants reached full maturity phase) and three other variants with five-day interval each. In 2016-2017 the productivity of the variety increased from the first (early) sowing date to the last (from 0.7 to 1.115-1.22 t/ha). The exception was 2015 when increase in productivity was noted only in the second and third sowing data (from 1.45 to 2.13-1.78 t/ha respectively). The greatest average productivity was achieved in 2015 - 1.64 t/ha; the smallest one - in 2016 - 0.84 t/ha. In 2016-2017 the indices of germination energy and viability of seeds decreased from the first sowing date to the last one. The exception was the third sowing date in 2015 at germination rate of 98% or 6.5-11.3% higher than other planting dates. The highest percentage of viability and germination energy was in the seeds harvested in 2017 - 97.2 and 94.5%, respectively. The lowest parameters of sowing seed qualities were noted in 2016: viability - 89.6%, germination energy - 88.2%. The effect of the year and harvesting date on the productivity of spring soft wheat was observed. The most significant increase in productivity in 2016-2017 was observed in variant of the second harvesting date; in 2015 - in variant of the forth harvesting date. Decrease in indicators of grain unit and of 1000-grain mass occurred from first harvesting date until the last one. The average index of grain unit at the first harvesting date was 788 g/l; at the last date - 780 g/l, the average index of 1000-grain mass was 37.6 and 37.4 g, respectively. On the average, for the years of study according to the sowing qualities of grains, the first sowing date (early, at soil physical maturity) was recognized as the optimum date. Optimal harvesting date is the second (when 100% of plants reach full seed maturity).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
In 2016-2017 productivity of the wheat variety increased from the earliest to the latest sowing date, from 0.7 to 1.115-1.22 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- sowing datee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.7 to 1.115-1.22 t/hae0
- Comparator
- first (early) sowing datee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“In 2016-2017 the productivity of the variety increased from the first (early) sowing date to the last (from 0.7 to 1.115-1.22 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2015 productivity increased only at the second and third sowing dates, from 1.45 to 2.13-1.78 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sowing datae0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1.45 to 2.13-1.78 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The exception was 2015 when increase in productivity was noted only in the second and third sowing data (from 1.45 to 2.13-1.78 t/ha respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
The greatest average productivity was achieved in 2015, at 1.64 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- average productivitye0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 1.64 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The greatest average productivity was achieved in 2015 - 1.64 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The smallest average productivity was in 2016, at 0.84 t/ha.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- average productivitye0
- Direction
- smalleste1
- Value
- 0.84 t/hae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The greatest average productivity was achieved in 2015”
e1“the smallest one - in 2016 - 0.84 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2016-2017 germination energy and viability of seeds decreased from the first to the last sowing date.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sowing datee0
- Outcome
- germination energy and viability of seedse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- first sowing datee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“In 2016-2017 the indices of germination energy and viability of seeds decreased from the first sowing date to the last one”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2015 the third sowing date gave a germination rate of 98%, 6.5-11.3% higher than other planting dates.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- third sowing datee0
- Outcome
- germination ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 98%e0
- Qualifier
- 6.5-11.3% highere0
- Comparator
- other planting datese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The exception was the third sowing date in 2015 at germination rate of 98% or 6.5-11.3% higher than other planting dates”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeds harvested in 2017 had the highest viability, 97.2%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- viabilitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 97.2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The highest percentage of viability and germination energy was in the seeds harvested in 2017 - 97.2 and 94.5%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Seeds harvested in 2017 had the highest germination energy, 94.5%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 94.5%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The highest percentage of viability and germination energy was in the seeds harvested in 2017 - 97.2 and 94.5%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2016 seed viability was lowest, at 89.6%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- viabilitye0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 89.6%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The lowest parameters of sowing seed qualities were noted in 2016: viability - 89.6%, germination energy - 88.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2016 seed germination energy was lowest, at 88.2%.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- germination energye0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 88.2%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The lowest parameters of sowing seed qualities were noted in 2016: viability - 89.6%, germination energy - 88.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
Year and harvesting date affected the productivity of spring soft wheat.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- harvesting datee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The effect of the year and harvesting date on the productivity of spring soft wheat was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2016-2017 the largest productivity increase occurred with the second harvesting date.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- second harvesting datee0
- Outcome
- increase in productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The most significant increase in productivity in 2016-2017 was observed in variant of the second harvesting date”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2015 the largest productivity increase occurred with the fourth harvesting date.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- forth harvesting datee1
- Outcome
- increase in productivitye0
- Direction
- increasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The most significant increase in productivity”
e1“in 2015 - in variant of the forth harvesting date”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain unit and 1000-grain mass indicators decreased from the first to the last harvesting date.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- harvesting datee0
- Outcome
- grain unit and of 1000-grain masse0
- Direction
- Decreasee0
- Comparator
- first harvesting datee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“Decrease in indicators of grain unit and of 1000-grain mass occurred from first harvesting date until the last one”
Claim · model-written summary
The average grain unit index was 788 g/l at the first harvesting date and 780 g/l at the last.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- average index of grain unite0
- Value
- 788 g/le0
- Qualifier
- at the last date - 780 g/le0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“The average index of grain unit at the first harvesting date was 788 g/l; at the last date - 780 g/l”
Claim · model-written summary
The average 1000-grain mass was 37.6 g and 37.4 g at the first and last harvesting dates respectively.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- average index of 1000-grain masse0
- Value
- 37.6 and 37.4 ge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“the average index of 1000-grain mass was 37.6 and 37.4 g, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
The first, early sowing date was judged optimal considering sowing qualities of grain.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- optimum datee0
- Qualifier
- early, at soil physical maturitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“the first sowing date (early, at soil physical maturity) was recognized as the optimum date”
Claim · model-written summary
The second harvesting date, when all plants reach full seed maturity, is optimal.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Optimal harvesting datee0
- Qualifier
- when 100% of plants reach full seed maturitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat Bazhenka seeds”
e0“Optimal harvesting date is the second (when 100% of plants reach full seed maturity)”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
265 papers in the same direction as this paper · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
458 papers more in this group
See all 462 papers →harvest time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.