Intervention effectmodel-written summary

I2 and I1 regimes did not differ significantly in grain, straw, or biological yields and most related traits.

A claim from Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality of Some Egyptian Wheat Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 and I1 regimes did not differ significantly in grain, straw, or biological yields and most related traits.

Treatment
skipping one irrigation only at ripening stage (I2 regime)e0
Outcome
grain, straw, biological yields/fad and most related traitse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
full irrigation (I1 regime)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no significant differences between full irrigation (I1 regime) and skipping one irrigation only at ripening stage (I2 regime) for grain, straw, biological yields/fad and most related traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1659
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67

Title

Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality of Some Egyptian Wheat Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes

M. Seleiman; M. Abdel-Aal Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2018. doi:10.21608/agro.2018.6352.1136

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-1828c20f3f81dbc30425bdf67f43de74507f55098a1ca7cd0a776f19d5eb5f84 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

harvest time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.