Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Skipping two irrigations significantly decreased grain weight per spike and grain, straw, and biological yields.

A claim from Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality of Some Egyptian Wheat Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Skipping two irrigations significantly decreased grain weight per spike and grain, straw, and biological yields.

Treatment
skipping two irrigations (I3 regime)e1
Outcome
grain weight/spike), yields/fad (grain, straw and biological)e0
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
full irrigation treatment (I1 regime)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight/spike), yields/fad (grain, straw and biological)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1071
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67
e1

“skipping two irrigations (I3 regime) significantly decreased growth characters (plant height, flag leaf area, total chlorophyll and days from sowing to heading as well as maturity), grain yield components (no. of spikes/m2 , spike length, no. of spikelets/spike, no. of grains/spikelet, no. of grains/spike, 1000 grain weight and grain weight/spike), yields/fad (grain, straw and biological), translocation indices (crop and harvest indices) and grain yielding ability as well as grain quality (protein and carbohydrate yields/fad and carbohydrate percentage) compared to full irrigation treatment (I1 regime)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–1289

Title

Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality of Some Egyptian Wheat Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes

M. Seleiman; M. Abdel-Aal Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 2018. doi:10.21608/agro.2018.6352.1136

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-ffd5a12718a65b39dedc57cedc7bb21b6efe3c37f3f6e6ba622b662b44acc080 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.