Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station, during the three winter successive seasons (2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015) to find out the effect of different dates and irrigation regimes on growth, yield and consumptive use of three wheat varieties under Sohag governorate conditions. Three bread wheat cultivars (Shandaweel-1, Giza-168 and Sids-12) were cultivated in two different sowing dates (20th November and 5h December) under three irrigation intervals treatments of 21, 28 and 35 days. The experiment was laid out in a split – split plot design with three replications. The results revealed significant differences among studied cultivars and irrigation treatments in most studied traits in all seasons. The second sowing date 5th December produced the best results of the growth components, grain yield and water use efficiency through the years of this study. The irrigation at 21 days gave the best values of grain yield values (18.234, 16.609 and 17.198 ardab/fed) for the three winter seasons 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15. The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.) while it was 2123.93 for I1, 1811.49 for I2, and 1606.19 for I3 m3 /fed for the second sowing date (5th Dec.). The irrigation water use efficiency was higher with using the irrigation treatment every 35 days. It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively. Shandaweel 1 produced the highest values of grain yield and water use efficiency at the two sowing dates and the irrigation regimes. Also the results of the second sowing date (5th December) for Shandaweel 1 were higher than these of first sowing date.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Significant differences among cultivars and irrigation treatments were found in most studied traits of wheat in all seasons.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- studied cultivarse0
- Treatment
- irrigation treatmentse0
- Outcome
- most studied traitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed significant differences among studied cultivars and irrigation treatments in most studied traits in all seasons”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The second sowing date, 5th December, produced the best growth components, grain yield and water use efficiency of wheat.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- second sowing date 5th Decembere0
- Outcome
- growth components, grain yield and water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- best resultse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The second sowing date 5th December produced the best results of the growth components, grain yield and water use efficiency through the years of this study”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 21 days gave the best wheat grain yield, 18.234 ardab/fed, in season 2012/13.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 21 dayse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 18.234e0
- Qualifier
- 2012/13e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation at 21 days gave the best values of grain yield values (18.234, 16.609 and 17.198 ardab/fed) for the three winter seasons 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 21 days gave the best wheat grain yield, 16.609 ardab/fed, in season 2013/14.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 21 dayse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 16.609e0
- Qualifier
- 2013/14e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation at 21 days gave the best values of grain yield values (18.234, 16.609 and 17.198 ardab/fed) for the three winter seasons 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation at 21 days gave the best wheat grain yield, 17.198 ardab/fed, in season 2014/15.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation at 21 dayse0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 17.198e0
- Qualifier
- 2014/15e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation at 21 days gave the best values of grain yield values (18.234, 16.609 and 17.198 ardab/fed) for the three winter seasons 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 2094.48 m3/fed under irrigation I1 at the first sowing date (20th Nov.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I1e0
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 2094.48e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th Nov.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 1883.46 m3/fed under irrigation I2 at the first sowing date (20th Nov.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I2e0
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 1883.46e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th Nov.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 1564.15 m3/fed under irrigation I3 at the first sowing date (20th Nov.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I3e0
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 1564.15e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th Nov.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 2123.93 m3/fed under irrigation I1 at the second sowing date (5th Dec.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I1e1
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 2123.93e1
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th Dec.)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
e1“while it was 2123.93 for I1, 1811.49 for I2, and 1606.19 for I3 m3 /fed for the second sowing date (5th Dec.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 1811.49 m3/fed under irrigation I2 at the second sowing date (5th Dec.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I2e1
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 1811.49e1
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th Dec.)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
e1“while it was 2123.93 for I1, 1811.49 for I2, and 1606.19 for I3 m3 /fed for the second sowing date (5th Dec.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Average water consumptive use of wheat was 1606.19 m3/fed under irrigation I3 at the second sowing date (5th Dec.).
- Taxon
- wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- I3e1
- Outcome
- water consumptive usee0
- Value
- 1606.19e1
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th Dec.)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The average water consumptive use by wheat plants were 2094.48 for I1, 1883.46 for I2 and 1564.15 for I3 m3/fed. at the first sowing date (20th Nov.)”
e1“while it was 2123.93 for I1, 1811.49 for I2, and 1606.19 for I3 m3 /fed for the second sowing date (5th Dec.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was higher with the irrigation treatment every 35 days.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation treatment every 35 dayse0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The irrigation water use efficiency was higher with using the irrigation treatment every 35 days”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.53 kgm-3 with irrigation every 21 days at the first sowing date (20th November).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.53e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th November)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.54 kgm-3 with irrigation every 28 days at the first sowing date (20th November).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.54e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th November)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.61 kgm-3 with irrigation every 35 days at the first sowing date (20th November).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.61e0
- Qualifier
- first sowing date (20th November)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.64 kgm-3 with irrigation every 21 days at the second sowing date (5th December).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.64e0
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th December)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.68 kgm-3 with irrigation every 28 days at the second sowing date (5th December).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.68e0
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th December)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water use efficiency of wheat was 0.68 kgm-3 with irrigation every 35 days at the second sowing date (5th December).
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- irrigation interval treatmente0
- Outcome
- irrigation water use efficiencye1
- Value
- 0.68e0
- Qualifier
- second sowing date (5th December)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was 0.53, 0.54, and 0.61 kgm-3 for the first sowing date (20th November) and it was 0.64, 0.68, and 0.68 kgm-3 for the second sowing date (5th December) by using the irrigation interval treatment at 21, 28, and 35 days, respectively”
e1“The irrigation water use efficiency”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Shandaweel 1 produced the highest grain yield and water use efficiency at the two sowing dates and the irrigation regimes.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Shandaweel 1e0
- Outcome
- grain yield and water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shandaweel 1 produced the highest values of grain yield and water use efficiency at the two sowing dates and the irrigation regimes”
t0“Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Results for Shandaweel 1 at the second sowing date were higher than at the first sowing date.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Shandaweel 1e0
- Treatment
- second sowing date (5th December)e0
- Outcome
- resultse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- first sowing datee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the results of the second sowing date (5th December) for Shandaweel 1 were higher than these of first sowing date”
t0“Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
299 papers more in this group
See all 303 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.