Paper · 2018

Impact of climate change on nutritional quality of maize and groundnut genotypes

S. Javoor; U. K. Shanwad; M. R. Umesh; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature, together with other climate change factors could greatly affects agricultural productivity as well as quality of produce. Understanding the change in atmospheric CO2 and temperature in conjunction with the ongoing global change is crucial to prepare for mitigation and any adoption for future agricultural production. Our study was mainly concentrated on response of maize and groundnut genotypes to climate change with respect to quality aspects. An experiment was conducted in Open Top Chambers (OTC’s) at the Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Science, Raichur. Two maize genotypes i.e. CP-818 and Hema and groundnut genotypes TMV-2 and K-9 were evaluated for two CO2 levels (ambient CO2 and elevated CO2 @ 550 ppm) along with combination of temperature (ambient temperature and elevated temperature @ 2 °C) for kharif and rabi seasons of 2015. Results of the experiments were analysed through two factor-CRD design with 5 replications. Maize quality parameters like oil, protein and starch content were analysed by NIR Transmission at UAS, Raichur. Similarly for groundnut oil, protein content and fatty acid profile were analysed at IIOR, Hyderabad. The results showed that under elevated CO2 @ 550 ppm condition, protein content in maize and groundnut was 8.1 and 19.8 per cent where as under ambient CO2 condition it was 9.8 and 22.6 per cent. Carbon compounds (starch, oil content and fatty acids) increased under elevated CO2 conditions. Oil content under elevated CO2 condition of maize and groundnut was 6.7 and 49.4 per cent, whereas under ambient condition it was 6.6 and 45.5 per cent. The elevated temperature had negative effect on quality aspects (decreased protein, oil and fatty acid composition) of the crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered maize protein content to 8.1 per cent from 9.8 per cent under ambient CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated CO2 @ 550 ppme0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
8.1e0
Qualifier
9.8e0
Comparator
ambient CO2 conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under elevated CO2 @ 550 ppm condition, protein content in maize and groundnut was 8.1 and 19.8 per cent where as under ambient CO2 condition it was 9.8 and 22.6 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 lowered groundnut protein content to 19.8 per cent from 22.6 per cent under ambient CO2.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
elevated CO2 @ 550 ppme0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
19.8e0
Qualifier
22.6e0
Comparator
ambient CO2 conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under elevated CO2 @ 550 ppm condition, protein content in maize and groundnut was 8.1 and 19.8 per cent where as under ambient CO2 condition it was 9.8 and 22.6 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch increased under elevated CO2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated CO2 conditionse0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon compounds (starch, oil content and fatty acids) increased under elevated CO2 conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fatty acids increased under elevated CO2.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
elevated CO2 conditionse0
Outcome
fatty acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon compounds (starch, oil content and fatty acids) increased under elevated CO2 conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased maize oil content to 6.7 per cent from 6.6 per cent.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
elevated CO2 conditione0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Value
6.7e0
Qualifier
6.6e0
Comparator
ambient conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content under elevated CO2 condition of maize and groundnut was 6.7 and 49.4 per cent, whereas under ambient condition it was 6.6 and 45.5 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased groundnut oil content to 49.4 per cent from 45.5 per cent.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
elevated CO2 conditione0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Value
49.4e0
Qualifier
45.5e0
Comparator
ambient conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content under elevated CO2 condition of maize and groundnut was 6.7 and 49.4 per cent, whereas under ambient condition it was 6.6 and 45.5 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature decreased crop protein.

Taxon
maize and groundnutArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated temperature had negative effect on quality aspects (decreased protein, oil and fatty acid composition) of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature decreased crop oil.

Taxon
maize and groundnutArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
oile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated temperature had negative effect on quality aspects (decreased protein, oil and fatty acid composition) of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature decreased crop fatty acid composition.

Taxon
maize and groundnutArachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
Treatment
elevated temperaturee0
Outcome
fatty acid compositione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevated temperature had negative effect on quality aspects (decreased protein, oil and fatty acid composition) of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1819 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–70 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

heat · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heat · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

co2 · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.