Abstract
A pot experiment was carried out in order to evaluate the efficacy of four pre-planting herbicides i.e. Amex 48%, Atrazine, Nitrofen and Stomp 5% in comparison with Oxamyl on Meloidogyne incognita infecting okra plant cv Hyper Doki 1 under greenhouse conditions (25±5 ºC). It was evident that all tested pesticides improved plant growth parameters and reduced nematode with various grades. Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%) and shoot dry weight (66.03%), respectively, followed by Nitrofen for the same plant criteria with values of 15.53, 21.67 and 59.86%, respectively. Moreover, Oxamyl as a nematicide showed extensive values in improving plant growth criteria and ranked first in suppressing nematode population density in soil, galls and eggmass numbers. Atrazine accomplished the reasonable reduction percentage in nematode population density in soil followed by that of Amex 48% application with value of 25.27%. There was no significant differences between the values of RGI and EI indices which achieved equal values with those of nematode alone(4).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
All tested pesticides improved okra growth.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- all tested pesticidese0
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“all tested pesticides improved plant growth parameters and reduced nematode with various grades”
t0“Okra Plant”
Claim · model-written summary
All tested pesticides reduced nematode levels to varying degrees.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- all tested pesticidese0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitat1pathogen - Outcome
- nematodee0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“all tested pesticides improved plant growth parameters and reduced nematode with various grades”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazien increased okra plant length by 19.84%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Atraziene0
- Outcome
- plant lengthe0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Value
- 19.84%e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%)”
t0“Okra Plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazien increased whole-plant fresh weight by 29.32%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Atraziene0
- Outcome
- whole plant fresh weighte0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Value
- 29.32%e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%)”
t0“Okra Plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazien increased shoot dry weight by 66.03%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Atraziene0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- improvinge0
- Value
- 66.03%e0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%) and shoot dry weight (66.03%)”
t0“Okra Plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrofen increased plant length by 15.53%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Nitrofene0
- Outcome
- plant lengthe1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 15.53e0
- Comparator
- Atraziene1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Nitrofen for the same plant criteria with values of 15.53, 21.67 and 59.86%, respectively”
t0“Okra Plant”
e1“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%) and shoot dry weight (66.03%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrofen increased whole-plant fresh weight by 21.67%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Nitrofene0
- Outcome
- whole plant fresh weighte1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 21.67e0
- Comparator
- Atraziene1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Nitrofen for the same plant criteria with values of 15.53, 21.67 and 59.86%, respectively”
t0“Okra Plant”
e1“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%) and shoot dry weight (66.03%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrofen increased shoot dry weight by 59.86%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Nitrofene0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 59.86%e0
- Comparator
- Atraziene1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by Nitrofen for the same plant criteria with values of 15.53, 21.67 and 59.86%, respectively”
t0“Okra Plant”
e1“Atrazien overwhelmed other treatments in improving plant growth parameters for plant length (19.84%), whole plant fresh weight (29.32%) and shoot dry weight (66.03%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Oxamyl improved okra growth criteria.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Oxamyle0
- Outcome
- plant growth criteriae0
- Direction
- improvinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oxamyl as a nematicide showed extensive values in improving plant growth criteria”
t0“Okra Plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Oxamyl ranked first for suppressing soil nematode population density.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Oxamyle0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode population density in soile0
- Direction
- suppressinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oxamyl as a nematicide showed extensive values in improving plant growth criteria and ranked first in suppressing nematode population density in soil, galls and eggmass numbers”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Oxamyl ranked first for suppressing gall and eggmass numbers.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Oxamyle1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
- Outcome
- galls and eggmass numberse0
- Direction
- suppressinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ranked first in suppressing nematode population density in soil, galls and eggmass numbers”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
e1“Oxamyl as a nematicide”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine reduced soil nematode population density.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Atrazinee0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode population density in soile0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Atrazine accomplished the reasonable reduction percentage in nematode population density in soil”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Amex 48% reduced soil nematode population density by 25.27%.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Amex 48% applicatione0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
- Outcome
- nematode population density in soile1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Value
- 25.27%e0
- Comparator
- Atrazinee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by that of Amex 48% application with value of 25.27%”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
e1“Atrazine accomplished the reasonable reduction percentage in nematode population density in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
RGI and EI indices did not differ significantly from nematode-only values of four.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
- Outcome
- RGI and EI indicese0
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
- Value
- 4e0
- Comparator
- nematode alonee0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant differences between the values of RGI and EI indices which achieved equal values with those of nematode alone(4)”
t0“Okra Plant”
t1“Meloidogyne Incognita”
The same questions in other papers
oxamyl · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
oxamyl · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.