Paper · 2002 · Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science

The Relevance Of Poultry And Pig Droppings As Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato In Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria

E. I. Nwanguma; J. B. Awoderu

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied. The Organic Wastes Were Respectively Worked Into The Soil At The Rate Of 16tha-1 just before sowing Of Okra Seeds Or Transplanting Tomato Seedlings. Their Combination Was Applied Into The Plot In Equal Proportion Of 8tha-1. Mocap (Nematicide) Was Applied At The Rate Of 9kg A.I. Per Hectare. The Unamended Plots Served As The Control. The Field Layout Was A Randomized Complete Block Design In Four Replications. The Nematicide Effect On Meloidogyne Incognita Populations Was Not Different From The Corresponding Effect Of Poultry Manure. However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types. Similarly, Plant Treated With Poultry Manure Recorded Significant Vegetative And Reproductive Growth When Compared With Other Tested Variables. Key Words: Organic Manure, Root-Knot, Meloidogyne Incognita; Lycopersicon, Lycopersicon, Abelmoschus Esculentus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematicide Mocap effect on Meloidogyne incognita populations was not different from the effect of poultry manure.

Taxon
Okra And Tomatoe1
Treatment
Mocap (Nematicide)e3
Interactor
Meloidogyne IncognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pest
Outcome
Meloidogyne Incognita Populationse2
Direction
Not Differente2
Comparator
Poultry Manuree2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e2

“The Nematicide Effect On Meloidogyne Incognita Populations Was Not Different From The Corresponding Effect Of Poultry Manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–644 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mocap (Nematicide) Was Applied At The Rate Of 9kg A.I. Per Hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mocap suppressed the pest populations significantly more than other manure types.

Taxon
Okra And Tomatoe1
Treatment
Mocape4
Interactor
Root-Knot NematodeMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
Pest Populationse4
Direction
Significantly Highere4
Comparator
Other Manure Typese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure suppressed the pest populations significantly more than other manure types.

Taxon
Okra And Tomatoe1
Treatment
Poultrye4
Interactor
Root-Knot NematodeMeloidogynee1pest
Outcome
Pest Populationse4
Direction
Significantly Highere4
Comparator
Other Manure Typese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e4

“However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with poultry manure had significantly higher vegetative and reproductive growth than other tested variables.

Taxon
Okra And Tomatoe1
Treatment
Poultry Manuree5
Outcome
Vegetative And Reproductive Growthe5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Comparator
Other Tested Variablese5

Verbatim

e1

“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e5

“Similarly, Plant Treated With Poultry Manure Recorded Significant Vegetative And Reproductive Growth When Compared With Other Tested Variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–928 · show in text ↑

insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Nematicides reduced tomato root gall index.

    Efficacy of new nematicides for managing Meloidogyne incognita in tomato crop · 2019 · compared with non‐treated control

    No difference from an alternative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.