Abstract
The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied. The Organic Wastes Were Respectively Worked Into The Soil At The Rate Of 16tha-1 just before sowing Of Okra Seeds Or Transplanting Tomato Seedlings. Their Combination Was Applied Into The Plot In Equal Proportion Of 8tha-1. Mocap (Nematicide) Was Applied At The Rate Of 9kg A.I. Per Hectare. The Unamended Plots Served As The Control. The Field Layout Was A Randomized Complete Block Design In Four Replications. The Nematicide Effect On Meloidogyne Incognita Populations Was Not Different From The Corresponding Effect Of Poultry Manure. However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types. Similarly, Plant Treated With Poultry Manure Recorded Significant Vegetative And Reproductive Growth When Compared With Other Tested Variables. Key Words: Organic Manure, Root-Knot, Meloidogyne Incognita; Lycopersicon, Lycopersicon, Abelmoschus Esculentus.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
The nematicide Mocap effect on Meloidogyne incognita populations was not different from the effect of poultry manure.
- Taxon
- Okra And Tomatoe1
- Treatment
- Mocap (Nematicide)e3
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne Incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae2pest - Outcome
- Meloidogyne Incognita Populationse2
- Direction
- Not Differente2
- Comparator
- Poultry Manuree2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”
e2“The Nematicide Effect On Meloidogyne Incognita Populations Was Not Different From The Corresponding Effect Of Poultry Manure”
e3“Mocap (Nematicide) Was Applied At The Rate Of 9kg A.I. Per Hectare”
Claim · model-written summary
Mocap suppressed the pest populations significantly more than other manure types.
- Taxon
- Okra And Tomatoe1
- Treatment
- Mocape4
- Interactor
- Root-Knot Nematode
Meloidogynee1pest - Outcome
- Pest Populationse4
- Direction
- Significantly Highere4
- Comparator
- Other Manure Typese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”
e4“However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types”
Claim · model-written summary
Poultry manure suppressed the pest populations significantly more than other manure types.
- Taxon
- Okra And Tomatoe1
- Treatment
- Poultrye4
- Interactor
- Root-Knot Nematode
Meloidogynee1pest - Outcome
- Pest Populationse4
- Direction
- Significantly Highere4
- Comparator
- Other Manure Typese4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”
e4“However The Suppressive Effect Of Mocap And Poultry On The Pest Populations Were Significantly Higher When Compare With Other Manure Types”
Claim · model-written summary
Plants treated with poultry manure had significantly higher vegetative and reproductive growth than other tested variables.
Verbatim
e1“The Efficacy Of Poultry And Pig Manure As Root-Knot Nematode Suppressants On Okra And Tomato Were Studied”
e5“Similarly, Plant Treated With Poultry Manure Recorded Significant Vegetative And Reproductive Growth When Compared With Other Tested Variables”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
203 papers more in this group
See all 207 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.