Paper · 2019 · Journal of Central European Agriculture

Content and yield of oil in spring rape seeds in conditions of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization

Bożena Barczak; Zbigniew Skinder; Roman Piotrowski

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nd

Abstract

A three-year field experiment was conducted in northern Poland on degraded black soil, valuation class IIIb, with very high content of phosphorus and potassium, low content of sulphur, and neutral pH. The experiment was carried out in a split-block design with two factors, in four replications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different application rates of nitrogen (factor A: 0, 60, 120 and 180 kg N·ha-1) and sulphur (factor B: 0, 20 and 60 kg S·ha-1), taking into account different means of its application (soil application before sowing and foliar application of sulphur) on the oil content and yield in seeds of the Star cultivar of rapeseed. Somewhat higher oil content and yield were observed in the case of soil application of sulphur than for foliar application. In each growing season nitrogen and sulphur applied independently significantly increased the oil content and yield from the seeds of spring rapeseed as compared to the control. Irrespective of the means of application, application of sulphur together with nitrogen generally resulted in higher oil content and yield than application of either of these nutrients alone, but their interaction was not confirmed statistically. The observed beneficial effect of sulphur applied alone and together with nitrogen on important criteria of spring rapeseed quality substantiates the need to include sulphur in fertilization of this species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulphur application produced somewhat higher oil content than foliar application.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
soil application of sulphure0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Somewhat higher oil content and yield were observed in the case of soil application of sulphur than for foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulphur application produced somewhat higher oil yield than foliar application.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
soil application of sulphure0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Somewhat higher oil content and yield were observed in the case of soil application of sulphur than for foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone significantly increased spring rapeseed oil content versus control.

Taxon
spring rapeseede0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen and sulphur applied independently significantly increased the oil content and yield from the seeds of spring rapeseed as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen alone significantly increased spring rapeseed oil yield versus control.

Taxon
spring rapeseede0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen and sulphur applied independently significantly increased the oil content and yield from the seeds of spring rapeseed as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur alone significantly increased spring rapeseed oil content versus control.

Taxon
spring rapeseede0
Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen and sulphur applied independently significantly increased the oil content and yield from the seeds of spring rapeseed as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur alone significantly increased spring rapeseed oil yield versus control.

Taxon
spring rapeseede0
Treatment
sulphure0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen and sulphur applied independently significantly increased the oil content and yield from the seeds of spring rapeseed as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur together with nitrogen generally increased oil content over either nutrient alone, without a significant interaction.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
sulphur together with nitrogene0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
either of these nutrients alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur together with nitrogen generally resulted in higher oil content and yield than application of either of these nutrients alone, but their interaction was not confirmed statistically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur together with nitrogen generally increased oil yield over either nutrient alone, without a significant interaction.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
sulphur together with nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
either of these nutrients alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sulphur together with nitrogen generally resulted in higher oil content and yield than application of either of these nutrients alone, but their interaction was not confirmed statistically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including sulphur in spring rapeseed fertilization.

Taxon
spring rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
include sulphur in fertilization of this speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantiates the need to include sulphur in fertilization of this species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

application · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 85 positive, 8 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

239 papers: 198 positive, 41 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

235 papers more in this group

See all 239 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.