Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Protection of Tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum from Wilt Pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Glomus sp.

S. Merina Prem Kumari; B. Jeberlin Prabina

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi benefits plants by improving the uptake of phosphate and other nutrients from soil and also increases the disease tolerance to the host plant. The fungal pathogens cause huge loss to vegetable crops when infected. In order to overcome this problem, the influence of AMF in the control of fungal plant pathogens is studied. AMF, Glomus sp. was isolated from the rhizosphere soil of tomato plants. The wilt pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici was cultured from the infected roots of tomato plants. The interaction of AMF and soil borne pathogen was carried out in tomato by in vitro and pot culture experiment using Glomus sp. and wilt causing pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici. In vitro interaction of AMF root and fungal pathogen resulted in the formation of clearing zone around the root indicating the production of antimicrobial compounds from the mycorrhizal root that arrested the mycelial growth of the fungal pathogen. The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AMF root formed a clearing zone against the fungal pathogen in vitro.

Taxon
roote0
Interactor
fungal pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
clearing zone around the roote0

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro interaction of AMF root and fungal pathogen resulted in the formation of clearing zone around the root indicating the production of antimicrobial compounds from the mycorrhizal root that arrested the mycelial growth of the fungal pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–978 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antimicrobial compounds from the mycorrhizal root were proposed to arrest pathogen mycelial growth.

Taxon
roote0
Interactor
fungal pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
mycorrhizale0symbiont
Compound
antimicrobial compoundse0
Outcome
mycelial growth of the fungal pathogene0

Verbatim

e0

“indicating the production of antimicrobial compounds from the mycorrhizal root that arrested the mycelial growth of the fungal pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre AMF then pathogen inoculation reduced tomato disease incidence.

Treatment
pre AMF – post pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre AMF then pathogen inoculation increased tomato growth and dry weight.

Treatment
pre AMF – post pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth, dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre AMF then pathogen inoculation increased tomato N, P and K content.

Treatment
pre AMF – post pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
N, P, K contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre AMF then pathogen inoculation increased tomato chlorophyll content.

Treatment
pre AMF – post pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre AMF then pathogen inoculation increased tomato yield.

Treatment
pre AMF – post pathogen inoculatione0
Interactor
pathogene0pathogen
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pot culture experiment revealed that the pre AMF – post pathogen inoculation to tomato reduced the disease incidence, and increased the plant growth, dry weight, N, P, K content, chlorophyll content and yield of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1205 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

65 papers: 59 positive, 6 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

mycorrhiza · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 58 positive, 15 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 85 positive, 2 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 127 positive, 17 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.