Paper · 2019 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Soil Compaction Induced Changes in Morpho-physiological Characteristics of Common Bean

Mariela Rivera; José Polanía; Jaumer Ricaurte; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The progress in identification of genotypes with roots showing greater ability to penetrate compacted soils under moisture stress and understanding the physiological basis and morphological expression of the characteristics associated is fundamental to improving crop’s tolerance to drought and to increase productivity under individual and combined stress conditions. Our objectives were to: (i) determine genotypic differences in root penetration ability of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using two methods (compacted soil layers and wax-petrolatum layers) to simulate soil compaction; and (ii) identify the morpho-physiological characteristics associated with the ability to penetrate compacted layers under well-watered and intermittent drought conditions in a greenhouse environment. Six common bean genotypes of different origin (Andean, Mesoamerican and interspecific) were tested in two trials. In the first trial, we evaluated genotypic differences in morpho-physiological characteristics that were associated with the root’s ability to penetrate compacted soil layers of 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 g cm −3 bulk densities. In the second trial, we used another method to determine genotypic differences in root’s ability to penetrate wax-petrolatum layers of low, medium, and high mechanical impedance. The conditions for root growth were severely restricted by compaction and aggravated by drought stress. The medium level of mechanical impedance of wax petrolatum layer method showed the best results to evaluate bean genotypes for soil compaction tolerance. Among the six genotypes tested, ALB 91 (an interspecific line) was identified as the one with the greatest root penetration ability compared with A774 which showed the lowest root penetration ability under both well-watered and drought conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compaction severely restricted bean root growth.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
compactione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
severely restrictede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conditions for root growth were severely restricted by compaction and aggravated by drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought aggravated the restriction of root growth under compaction.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
aggravatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conditions for root growth were severely restricted by compaction and aggravated by drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium impedance wax petrolatum layers gave the best evaluation of genotype tolerance to compaction.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
medium level of mechanical impedancee0
Outcome
best resultse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The medium level of mechanical impedance of wax petrolatum layer method showed the best results to evaluate bean genotypes for soil compaction tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ALB 91 had the greatest root penetration and A774 the lowest under both water conditions.

Taxon
Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
ALB 91e0
Outcome
root penetration abilitye0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
under both well-watered and drought conditionse0
Comparator
A774e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the six genotypes tested, ALB 91 (an interspecific line) was identified as the one with the greatest root penetration ability compared with A774 which showed the lowest root penetration ability under both well-watered and drought conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

65 papers: 6 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

tillage · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 9 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.