Paper · 2019 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Assessment of Environment-friendly Usage of Spent Wash and its Nutritional Potential for Sugarcane Production

Muhammad Nawaz; Shahbaz Khan; Hakoomat Ali; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Excessive and inappropriate use of fertilizers is a key factor of low sugarcane yield and degradation of soil. A two-year (2013–14 and 2014–15) field study was conducted to assess the impact of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on sugarcane at research farm of Shakarganj Sugar Research Institute, Jhang, Pakistan. Experiment was conducted under randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments were used as control (no exogenous application), spent wash (160 t ha−1), (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) NPK (168:112:112 kg ha−1), spent wash (120 t ha−1) + NPK (42:28:28 kg ha−1), spent wash (80 t ha−1) + NPK (84:56:56 kg ha−1), spent wash (40 t ha−1) + NPK (126:84:84 kg ha−1), and spent wash (160 t ha−1) + NPK (42:28:28 kg ha−1). Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 resulted maximum crop growth rate (11.35 g m−2 d−1), leaf area index (7.78), and net assimilation rate (2.53 g m−2 d−1). Maximum number of millable canes (14), weight per stripped cane (0.90 kg), stripped cane yield (117.60 t ha−1) and unstripped cane yield (141.25 t ha−1) were observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1, followed by sole fertilizer application @ 168:112:112 kg NPK ha−1 and spent wash @160 t ha−1 + NPK @ 42:28:28 kg ha−1. Similar trend was observed regarding quality parameters. The maximum benefit–cost ratio (1.80) was achieved with integrated application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 gave the maximum crop growth rate in sugarcane (11.35 g m−2 d−1).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
crop growth ratee1
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.35 g m−2 d−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 resulted maximum crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop growth rate (11.35 g m−2 d−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 gave the maximum leaf area index in sugarcane (7.78).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.78e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 resulted maximum crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (7.78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 gave the maximum net assimilation rate in sugarcane (2.53 g m−2 d−1).

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee1
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.53 g m−2 d−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1 resulted maximum crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“net assimilation rate (2.53 g m−2 d−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum number of millable canes in sugarcane (14) was observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
number of millable canese0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
14e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of millable canes (14)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“were observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum weight per stripped cane in sugarcane (0.90 kg) was observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
weight per stripped canee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
0.90 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of millable canes (14), weight per stripped cane (0.90 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“were observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum stripped cane yield in sugarcane (117.60 t ha−1) was observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
stripped cane yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
117.60 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of millable canes (14), weight per stripped cane (0.90 kg), stripped cane yield (117.60 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“were observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum unstripped cane yield in sugarcane (141.25 t ha−1) was observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
unstripped cane yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
141.25 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum number of millable canes (14), weight per stripped cane (0.90 kg), stripped cane yield (117.60 t ha−1) and unstripped cane yield (141.25 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“were observed with spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1183 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality parameters of sugarcane showed a similar trend to the growth and yield results.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Qualifier
Similar trende0

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Similar trend was observed regarding quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum benefit-cost ratio (1.80) was achieved with integrated application of spent wash at 80 t/ha plus NPK at 84:56:56 kg/ha in sugarcane.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
benefit–cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.80e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum benefit–cost ratio (1.80) was achieved with integrated application of spent wash @ 80 t ha−1 + NPK @ 84:56:56 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1490 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.